• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉根部和升主动脉再次手术。

Reoperations on the aortic root and ascending aorta.

作者信息

Dougenis D, Daily B B, Kouchoukos N T

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, and the Heart Center, Missouri Baptist Medical Center, BJC Health System, St. Louis, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Oct;64(4):986-92. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00626-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00626-7
PMID:9354515
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reoperations on the aortic root and the ascending aorta are being performed with increasing frequency and remain a challenging problem.

METHODS

Eighty-one patients (age range, 14 to 78 years) underwent reoperations on the aortic root or the ascending aorta during a 14.5-year interval ending October 1996. The previous operations were aortic valve procedure (28%), coronary artery bypass grafting (25%), aortic root replacement (24%), ascending aortic replacement (19%), and miscellaneous (5%). Twenty-two patients (27%) had had two or more previous operations. The principal indications for reoperation were true or false aneurysm (35%), acute or chronic dissection (28%), and malfunction of an aortic valve substitute (27%). The reoperations performed were aortic root replacement (composite graft, allograft, or autograft) in 48 patients and graft replacement of the ascending aorta in 33 patients. Concomitant procedures included aortic arch replacement in 43 patients (55%) and coronary artery bypass grafting in 33 patients (41%).

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate was 8.6% (7 patients). It was 8.3% for aortic root replacement and 9.1% for ascending aorta replacement (p > 0.05). Using stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis of 23 variables, preoperative functional class III/IV (p = 0.047) and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (p = 0.007) were significant independent predictors of early death. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.6 years. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates were 89%, 81%, and 69%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation on the heart or ascending aorta was 98%, 92%, and 69%, respectively. Reoperation for false aneurysm (p = 0.050) and the presence of coexisting coronary artery disease requiring bypass grafting (p = 0.010) were the only significant predictors of late mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperations on the aortic root and the ascending aorta can be accomplished with acceptable early mortality and satisfactory long-term results. More frequent resection of the aneurysmal or dissected segments of the ascending aorta and aortic root at the initial operation may reduce the need for subsequent reoperation.

摘要

背景

主动脉根部和升主动脉再次手术的频率日益增加,仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。

方法

在截至1996年10月的14.5年期间,81例患者(年龄范围14至78岁)接受了主动脉根部或升主动脉的再次手术。先前的手术包括主动脉瓣手术(28%)、冠状动脉旁路移植术(25%)、主动脉根部置换术(24%)、升主动脉置换术(19%)以及其他手术(5%)。22例患者(27%)曾接受过两次或更多次先前手术。再次手术的主要指征为真性或假性动脉瘤(35%)、急性或慢性主动脉夹层(28%)以及主动脉瓣置换物功能障碍(27%)。实施的再次手术包括48例患者的主动脉根部置换术(复合移植物、同种异体移植物或自体移植物)和33例患者的升主动脉移植物置换术。同期手术包括43例患者(55%)的主动脉弓置换术和33例患者(41%)的冠状动脉旁路移植术。

结果

30天死亡率为8.6%(7例患者)。主动脉根部置换术的死亡率为8.3%,升主动脉置换术的死亡率为9.1%(p>0.05)。对23个变量进行逐步多因素逻辑回归分析,术前功能分级III/IV(p=0.047)和体外循环时间(p=0.007)是早期死亡的显著独立预测因素。平均随访时间为3.6年。1年、5年和10年生存率分别为89%、81%和69%。心脏或升主动脉再次手术的无复发生存率分别为98%、92%和69%。假性动脉瘤再次手术(p=0.050)以及存在需要旁路移植术的并存冠状动脉疾病(p=0.010)是晚期死亡的唯一显著预测因素。

结论

主动脉根部和升主动脉再次手术可取得可接受的早期死亡率和满意的长期效果。在初次手术时更频繁地切除升主动脉和主动脉根部的动脉瘤或夹层段可能会减少后续再次手术的需求。

相似文献

1
Reoperations on the aortic root and ascending aorta.主动脉根部和升主动脉再次手术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Oct;64(4):986-92. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00626-7.
2
Composite aortic root replacement with direct coronary artery implantation.带直接冠状动脉植入的复合主动脉根部置换术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Oct;62(4):1090-5. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00487-0.
3
Twenty-four year experience with reoperations after ascending aortic or aortic root replacement.升主动脉或主动脉根部置换术后再次手术的24年经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Dec;16(6):607-12. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00326-7.
4
Sixteen-year experience with aortic root replacement. Results of 172 operations.主动脉根部置换术的十六年经验。172例手术的结果。
Ann Surg. 1991 Sep;214(3):308-18; discussion 318-20. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199109000-00013.
5
Reoperations on the ascending aorta and aortic root: pitfalls and results in 134 patients.升主动脉和主动脉根部再次手术:134例患者的陷阱与结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Nov;68(5):1676-80. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00760-2.
6
Predicting outcome after reoperative procedures on the aortic root and ascending aorta.预测主动脉根部和升主动脉再次手术后的结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 May;17(5):602-7. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00387-0.
7
Re-operations for aortic allograft root failure: experience from a 21-year single-center prospective follow-up study.同种异体主动脉根部重建失败的再次手术:21 年单中心前瞻性随访研究的经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jul;40(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.025. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
8
Replacement of the ascending aorta with composite valve grafts: long term results.采用复合瓣膜移植物置换升主动脉:长期结果
J Heart Valve Dis. 1996 May;5(3):240-6.
9
Five-year experience in aortic root replacement with the flanged composite graft.使用带法兰复合移植物进行主动脉根部置换的五年经验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Apr;73(4):1130-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03604-9.
10
Aortic root replacement after previous surgical intervention on the aortic valve, aortic root, or ascending aorta.既往曾对主动脉瓣、主动脉根部或升主动脉进行手术干预后行主动脉根部置换术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Mar;131(3):601-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.11.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Over Two Decades of Experience in Aortic Arch Reoperations: Long-Term Outcomes and Mortality Risk Factors.超过二十年的主动脉弓再次手术经验:长期结果及死亡风险因素。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 10;14(12):4087. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124087.
2
Aortic Root Surgery in Adults: An Unsolved Problem.成人主动脉根部手术:一个未解决的问题。
Aorta (Stamford). 2023 Feb;11(1):29-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757949. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Mid-term outcomes of an alternative remodelling technique for aortic root replacement without coronary ostial mobilisation or reimplantation.
主动脉根部替换术中一种不进行冠状动脉开口游离或再植入的替代重塑技术的中期结果。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Feb 1;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-02051-x.
4
Tips and tricks in redo aortic surgery.再次主动脉手术的技巧与窍门。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Apr;38(Suppl 1):163-170. doi: 10.1007/s12055-021-01322-x. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Is aortic valve-sparing root reimplantation (David-I) justified in cardiac redo surgery?在心脏再次手术中,主动脉瓣环保留的根部再植入术(David-I)是否合理?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun 15;35(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac058.
6
Trans-catheter closure of aortic anastomosis leak after aortic replacement: classifications and techniques.主动脉置换术后经导管封堵主动脉吻合口漏:分类与技术
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Sep;12(9):4883-4891. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1496.
7
Perspective. Reoperative Bentall: choice of conduits.观点。再次进行Bentall手术:管道的选择。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;35(Suppl 2):127-129. doi: 10.1007/s12055-017-0607-x. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
8
Redo proximal thoracic aortic surgery: challenges and controversies.再次进行胸主动脉近端手术:挑战与争议
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;67(1):118-126. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-0941-y. Epub 2018 May 18.
9
Ascending aorta reinterventions.升主动脉再次干预
J Thorac Dis. 2017 May;9(Suppl 6):S448-S453. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.01.
10
Long-term durability of preserved aortic root after repair of acute type A aortic dissection.急性A型主动脉夹层修复术后保留主动脉根部的长期耐久性
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Aug;65(8):441-448. doi: 10.1007/s11748-017-0783-z. Epub 2017 May 18.