• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Classics from the spine literature revisited: a randomized trial of 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest for acute low back pain.

作者信息

Atlas S J, Volinn E

机构信息

Medical Practices Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Oct 15;22(20):2331-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199710150-00002.

DOI:10.1097/00007632-199710150-00002
PMID:9355212
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Review of a trial of bed rest for patients with acute low back pain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the validity and results of the study, and their applicability to and influence on current clinical practice and recommendations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although bed rest has been a cornerstone of treatment for acute low back pain, historically this recommendation was largely based on "expert opinion." In 1986, Deyo et al. published a randomized study of 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest for acute low back pain. Despite results from this and other studies, current clinical practice and treatment recommendations continue to overemphasize bed rest.

METHODS

The study was reviewed using structured criteria adopted from the medical literature that focus on the validity of the study design, the results of the treatment, and the relevance of the findings to clinical practice.

RESULTS

Two hundred and three patients were randomized to 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest. Groups were similar at baseline evaluation. Outcomes assessed at 3 and 12 weeks were similar between groups, except that patients receiving a recommendation for 2 days of bed rest had significantly fewer days of work absence than those recommended 7 days. Limitations of the study included poor compliance with recommended bed rest, especially in the 7-day group, a marginal sample size without information on relevant confidence intervals, and patient characteristics that may have affected the generalizability of these findings to others with acute low back pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limitations, this study provided strong evidence that less bed rest was associated with similar outcomes for acute low back pain along with quicker return to work. Results from this and other studies support a shift away from bed rest as a primary recommendation in the initial management of low back pain. In spite of this, bed rest recommendations for episodes of low back pain remain common. Additional efforts are needed to change clinical practice.

摘要

相似文献

1
Classics from the spine literature revisited: a randomized trial of 2 versus 7 days of recommended bed rest for acute low back pain.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Oct 15;22(20):2331-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199710150-00002.
2
Bed rest or normal activity for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.急性下腰痛患者的卧床休息或正常活动:一项随机对照试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jul 15;27(14):1487-93. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200207150-00002.
3
Bed rest for acute low back pain and sciatica.急性腰痛和坐骨神经痛的卧床休息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD001254. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001254.
4
The role of bed rest in acute low back pain.卧床休息在急性下背痛中的作用。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2004 Apr;102(4):202-4, 208.
5
The Cochrane review of bed rest for acute low back pain and sciatica.考科蓝协作网关于急性腰痛和坐骨神经痛卧床休息的综述。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2932-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00016.
6
The cochrane review of advice to stay active as a single treatment for low back pain and sciatica.考克兰关于保持运动作为腰痛和坐骨神经痛单一治疗方法的建议综述。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Aug 15;27(16):1736-41. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200208150-00010.
7
Systematic reviews of bed rest and advice to stay active for acute low back pain.关于急性下腰痛卧床休息及保持活动建议的系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Oct;47(423):647-52.
8
How many days of bed rest for acute low back pain? A randomized clinical trial.急性下背痛需要卧床休息几天?一项随机临床试验。
N Engl J Med. 1986 Oct 23;315(17):1064-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198610233151705.
9
Does 48 hours' bed rest influence the outcome of acute low back pain?48小时卧床休息会影响急性腰痛的治疗结果吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Sep;45(398):481-4.
10
Compliance among general practitioners in France with recommendations not to prescribe bed rest for acute low back pain.
Joint Bone Spine. 2004 Jan;71(1):56-9. doi: 10.1016/S1297-319X(03)00066-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Routine primary care management of acute low back pain: adherence to clinical guidelines.急性下腰痛的常规初级保健管理:对临床指南的遵循情况
Eur Spine J. 2003 Dec;12(6):589-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0567-2. Epub 2003 Nov 6.
2
Neck and Back Pain in the Elderly.老年人的颈部和背部疼痛
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2001 May;3(3):215-228. doi: 10.1007/s11940-001-0003-z.
3
Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting.在基层医疗环境中评估和管理急性腰痛
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Feb;16(2):120-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.91141.x.