Shear M K, Brown T A, Barlow D H, Money R, Sholomskas D E, Woods S W, Gorman J M, Papp L A
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;154(11):1571-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.11.1571.
To address the lack of a simple and standardized instrument to assess overall panic disorder severity, the authors developed a scale for the measurement of panic disorder severity.
Ten independent evaluators used the seven-item Panic Disorder Severity Scale to assess 186 patients with principal DSM-III-R diagnoses of panic disorder (with no or mild agoraphobia) who were participating in the Multicenter Collaborative Treatment Study of Panic Disorder. In addition, 89 of these patients were reevaluated with the same scale after short-term treatment. A subset of 24 patients underwent two independent assessments to establish interrater reliability. Internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and sensitivity to change were also determined.
The Panic Disorder Severity Scale was associated with excellent interrater reliability, moderate internal consistency, and favorable levels of validity and sensitivity to change. Individual items showed good convergent and discriminant validity. Analysis suggested a two-factor model fit the data best.
The Panic Disorder Severity Scale is a simple, efficient way for clinicians to rate severity in patients with established diagnoses of panic disorder. However, further research with more diverse groups of panic disorder patients and with a broader range of convergent and discriminant validity measures is needed.
为解决缺乏一种简单且标准化的工具来评估惊恐障碍总体严重程度的问题,作者开发了一种惊恐障碍严重程度测量量表。
10名独立评估者使用七项惊恐障碍严重程度量表对186名主要依据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本》(DSM-III-R)诊断为惊恐障碍(无广场恐怖症或有轻度广场恐怖症)且参与惊恐障碍多中心协作治疗研究的患者进行评估。此外,其中89名患者在短期治疗后使用同一量表进行重新评估。24名患者的一个子集接受了两次独立评估以确定评估者间信度。还确定了内部一致性、聚合效度和区分效度以及对变化的敏感性。
惊恐障碍严重程度量表具有出色的评估者间信度、中等的内部一致性以及良好的效度水平和对变化的敏感性。各个条目显示出良好的聚合效度和区分效度。分析表明双因素模型最适合这些数据。
惊恐障碍严重程度量表是临床医生对已确诊惊恐障碍患者的严重程度进行评分的一种简单、有效的方法。然而,需要对更多不同组别的惊恐障碍患者进行进一步研究,并采用更广泛的聚合效度和区分效度测量方法。