• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整合心率变异性可改善基于机器学习的惊恐障碍症状严重程度预测。

Integrating Heart Rate Variability Improves Machine Learning-based Prediction of Panic Disorder Symptom Severity.

作者信息

Lee Jin Goo, Kim Jae-Jin, Seok Jeong-Ho, Kim Eunjoo, Oh Jooyoung, Bang Chang-Bae, Kim Byung-Hoon

机构信息

Eulji University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

Institute of Behavioral Sciences in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2025 Aug 31;23(3):400-410. doi: 10.9758/cpn.24.1261. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

DOI:10.9758/cpn.24.1261
PMID:40660686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12264673/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The association between panic disorder (PD) and heart rate variability (HRV) has long been studied with a focus on the imbalance of the autonomic nervous system. This study aims to demonstrate the predictive capability of HRV in determining PD severity using machine learning.

METHODS

Psychometric scales and various HRV components were measured from 507 PD patients who were recruited. We designed three experiments with different sets of input features for comparison. The input features of each experiment were 1) both psychometric scales and HRV together (ExSH), or 2) only the scales (ExS), or 3) only the HRV components. In each experiment, nine machine learning models were used to predict the Panic Disorder Severity Scale. We compared the predictive capability of the three sets of input features by statistically analyzing the performance metrics of the models in the three experiments. SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) was further employed to assess the importance of the input features.

RESULTS

The Random Forest model in ExSH, which incorporated both psychometric scales and HRV, achieved the highest f1-score (76.50%) and sensitivity (75.35%). ExSH showed significantly higher sensitivity and f1-score compared to ExS. For the RF model of ExSH, the highest SHAP importance value was found for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, followed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and the low-frequency power (LF).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that integrating HRV with psychometric scales improves machine learning-based prediction of PD severity. We also highlighted LF as a promising variable among HRV components.

摘要

目的

惊恐障碍(PD)与心率变异性(HRV)之间的关联长期以来一直是研究重点,主要关注自主神经系统的失衡。本研究旨在利用机器学习证明HRV在确定PD严重程度方面的预测能力。

方法

对招募的507名PD患者测量了心理测量量表和各种HRV成分。我们设计了三个实验,使用不同的输入特征集进行比较。每个实验的输入特征分别为:1)心理测量量表和HRV两者(ExSH),或2)仅量表(ExS),或3)仅HRV成分。在每个实验中,使用九个机器学习模型来预测惊恐障碍严重程度量表。我们通过统计分析三个实验中模型的性能指标,比较了三组输入特征的预测能力。进一步采用SHapley加法解释(SHAP)来评估输入特征的重要性。

结果

结合心理测量量表和HRV的ExSH中的随机森林模型获得了最高的F1分数(76.50%)和灵敏度(75.35%)。与ExS相比,ExSH显示出显著更高的灵敏度和F1分数。对于ExSH的随机森林模型,焦虑汉密尔顿评定量表的SHAP重要性值最高,其次是抑郁汉密尔顿评定量表和低频功率(LF)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,将HRV与心理测量量表相结合可改善基于机器学习的PD严重程度预测。我们还强调了LF是HRV成分中有前景的变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c1/12264673/3a4803ad5a36/cpn-23-3-400-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c1/12264673/4747eaa4786c/cpn-23-3-400-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c1/12264673/1a22177b6df6/cpn-23-3-400-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c1/12264673/3a4803ad5a36/cpn-23-3-400-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c1/12264673/4747eaa4786c/cpn-23-3-400-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c1/12264673/1a22177b6df6/cpn-23-3-400-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8c1/12264673/3a4803ad5a36/cpn-23-3-400-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrating Heart Rate Variability Improves Machine Learning-based Prediction of Panic Disorder Symptom Severity.整合心率变异性可改善基于机器学习的惊恐障碍症状严重程度预测。
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2025 Aug 31;23(3):400-410. doi: 10.9758/cpn.24.1261. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
2
Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人伴或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011004.pub2.
3
Classification of Individuals With COVID-19 and Post-COVID-19 Condition and Healthy Controls Using Heart Rate Variability: Machine Learning Study With a Near-Real-Time Monitoring Component.使用心率变异性对新冠肺炎患者、新冠后状况患者和健康对照者进行分类:一项包含近实时监测组件的机器学习研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e76613. doi: 10.2196/76613.
4
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) for detecting anxiety disorders in adults.用于检测成人焦虑症的医院焦虑抑郁量表焦虑分量表(HADS-A)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 2;7(7):CD015456. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015456.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
7
Stabilizing machine learning for reproducible and explainable results: A novel validation approach to subject-specific insights.稳定机器学习以获得可重复和可解释的结果:一种针对特定个体见解的新型验证方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025 Jun 21;269:108899. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108899.
8
Antidepressants versus placebo for panic disorder in adults.成人惊恐障碍患者使用抗抑郁药与安慰剂的对照研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD010676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010676.pub2.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis of heart rate variability in epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs.癫痫与抗癫痫药物治疗中心率变异性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epilepsia. 2012 Feb;53(2):272-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03361.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
10
Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.用于治疗自闭症谱系障碍儿童和青少年的哌醋甲酯
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 21;11(11):CD011144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011144.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical guide to SHAP analysis: Explaining supervised machine learning model predictions in drug development.SHAP 分析实用指南:在药物研发中解释有监督机器学习模型预测。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov;17(11):e70056. doi: 10.1111/cts.70056.
2
Explainable multimodal prediction of treatment-resistance in patients with depression leveraging brain morphometry and natural language processing.利用脑形态计量学和自然语言处理对抑郁症患者的治疗抵抗进行可解释的多模态预测。
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Apr;334:115817. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115817. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
3
Treatment Response Prediction in Major Depressive Disorder Using Multimodal MRI and Clinical Data: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
使用多模态磁共振成像和临床数据预测重度抑郁症的治疗反应:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
Am J Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 1;181(3):223-233. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230206. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
4
Mood Disorder Severity and Subtype Classification Using Multimodal Deep Neural Network Models.使用多模态深度神经网络模型进行情绪障碍严重程度和亚型分类
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 22;24(2):715. doi: 10.3390/s24020715.
5
Heart rate variability in generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder and panic disorder: A network meta-analysis and systematic review.广泛性焦虑症、重度抑郁症和恐慌症中的心率变异性:一项网状荟萃分析与系统评价
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 1;330:259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.018. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
6
Heart rate variability in patients with anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.焦虑障碍患者的心率变异性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jul;76(7):292-302. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13356. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Advancing Psychiatric Biomarker Discovery Through Multimodal Machine Learning.通过多模态机器学习推进精神科生物标志物的发现
Biol Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 15;91(6):524-525. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.12.009.
8
Heart Rate Variability and Its Ability to Detect Worsening Suicidality in Adolescents: A Pilot Trial of Wearable Technology.心率变异性及其检测青少年自杀倾向恶化的能力:可穿戴技术的初步试验
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Oct;18(10):928-935. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0057. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
9
Comparing machine learning algorithms for predicting ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19.比较用于预测新冠肺炎重症监护病房收治率和死亡率的机器学习算法
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 May 21;4(1):87. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00456-x.
10
Machine learning-based discrimination of panic disorder from other anxiety disorders.基于机器学习的惊恐障碍与其他焦虑症的鉴别
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 1;278:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Sep 11.