Oehlert M E, Hass S D, Freeman M R, Williams M D, Ryan J J, Sumerall S W
Dwight D. Eisenhower VA Medical Center Leavenworth, KS 66048, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 1997 Nov;53(7):733-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199711)53:7<733::aid-jclp11>3.0.co;2-m.
This study assessed the accuracy of the "screen" versus "metric" portions of eight subtests of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE). As part of a routine hospital assessment, 95 male patients were administered both portions of the instrument regardless of outcome on the screen. Results indicate that the screen items of some of the NCSE subtests produced a relatively high false negative rate, where the screen was passed, but the metric was failed. It is recommended that all items of the subtests be administered to more fully assess each domain and, therefore, reduce the probability of overlooking significant deficits.
本研究评估了神经行为认知状态检查(NCSE)八个子测试中“筛查”部分与“量化”部分的准确性。作为常规医院评估的一部分,95名男性患者无论筛查结果如何,均接受了该工具的两个部分的测试。结果表明,NCSE一些子测试的筛查项目产生了相对较高的假阴性率,即筛查通过但量化部分未通过。建议对各子测试的所有项目进行测试,以更全面地评估每个领域,从而降低忽视重大缺陷的可能性。