de Paula A A, de Carvalho E C
Escola de Enfermager Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 1997 Jul;5(3):35-42. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11691997000300006.
The aim of this study was to compare information on perioperative Nursing regarding audiovisual (video) and oral resources. 104 patients were registered as subjects and divided in two groups, 54 of them in the oral group and 50 in the video group. Authors concluded that the groups were homogeneous and that there was no significant difference between the two resources used. Independent from the resource used, the responses were qualitatively better. However, regarding perioperative informations, authors spent 10 minutes using the video while oral information lasted 45 minutes. The video unabled verbalization that is characterized by the exposition of methods and reduces the time spent with information.
本研究的目的是比较关于围手术期护理的视听(视频)资源和口头资源的信息。104名患者被登记为研究对象,并分为两组,其中54人在口头组,50人在视频组。作者得出结论,两组具有同质性,所使用的两种资源之间没有显著差异。无论使用何种资源,患者的反应在质量上都更好。然而,关于围手术期信息,作者使用视频花费了10分钟,而口头信息持续了45分钟。视频能够进行以方法阐述为特征的言语表达,并减少了信息传达所花费的时间。