Katzmann J A, Clark R, Wiegert E, Sanders E, Oda R P, Kyle R A, Namyst-Goldberg C, Landers J P
Special Protein Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Electrophoresis. 1997 Sep;18(10):1775-80. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150181011.
A selected group of 308 sera were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis (CE), agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE), and cellulose acetate electrophoresis (CAE) and evaluated for abnormalities that would suggest the presence of a monoclonal protein. The sensitivity (an electrophoretic abnormality in sera that contained a monoclonal protein) and specificity (a normal electrophoretic pattern in sera that did not contain a monoclonal protein) was determined for each electrophoretic procedure. CAE was the most specific procedure and CE was the most sensitive. The increase in sensitivity of CE was primarily due to increased detection of cryoglobulins and free light chains. The quantitation of the gamma region and/or monoclonal antibody peaks by CE was similar to results obtained by AGE. Quantitation of very large monoclonal protein peaks (> 3.0 g/dL) by on-line absorption detection (CE) yielded higher results than quantitation by dye-binding (AGE).
选取308份血清样本,采用毛细管电泳(CE)、琼脂糖凝胶电泳(AGE)和醋酸纤维素电泳(CAE)进行分析,并评估是否存在提示单克隆蛋白的异常情况。针对每种电泳方法测定了敏感性(含有单克隆蛋白的血清中的电泳异常)和特异性(不含有单克隆蛋白的血清中的正常电泳图谱)。CAE是最具特异性的方法,而CE是最敏感的。CE敏感性的提高主要归因于冷球蛋白和游离轻链检测的增加。CE对γ区和/或单克隆抗体峰的定量与AGE获得的结果相似。通过在线吸收检测(CE)对非常大的单克隆蛋白峰(>3.0 g/dL)进行定量,其结果高于通过染料结合法(AGE)进行的定量。