Suppr超能文献

内隐记忆测试中概念启动多种机制的证据。

Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests.

作者信息

Vaidya C J, Gabrieli J D, Keane M M, Monti L A, Gutiérrez-Rivas H, Zarella M M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stanford University, California 94305, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Nov;23(6):1324-43. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.6.1324.

Abstract

The authors examined effects of encoding manipulations on 4 conceptual-implicit memory tasks: word-cued association, category-cued association, category verification, and abstract/concrete classification. Study-phase conceptual elaboration enhanced priming for word-cued association with weakly associated words (Experiment 3), and for category-cued association with high- and low-dominance exemplars (Experiments 4 and 5), but did not enhance priming for word-cued association with strongly associated words (Experiments 1 and 2), for category verification with high- and low-dominance exemplars (Experiment 5), or for abstract/concrete classification (Experiment 7). Forms of priming that were unaffected by conceptual elaboration were not mediated by perceptual processes because they were unaffected by study-test modality changes (Experiments 6 and 8). The dissociative effects of conceptual elaboration on conceptual-implicit tasks suggest that at least 2 dissociable mechanisms mediate conceptual priming.

摘要

作者研究了编码操作对4种概念性内隐记忆任务的影响:词语线索联想、类别线索联想、类别验证以及抽象/具体分类。研究阶段的概念细化增强了与弱关联词语的词语线索联想的启动效应(实验3),以及与高主导性和低主导性范例的类别线索联想的启动效应(实验4和5),但没有增强与强关联词语的词语线索联想的启动效应(实验1和2)、与高主导性和低主导性范例的类别验证的启动效应(实验5)或抽象/具体分类的启动效应(实验7)。不受概念细化影响的启动效应形式并非由知觉过程介导,因为它们不受研究-测试模态变化的影响(实验6和8)。概念细化对概念性内隐任务的分离效应表明,至少有2种可分离的机制介导概念性启动效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验