Chen X H, Tsien R W
Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Beckman Center, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
J Biol Chem. 1997 Nov 28;272(48):30002-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.48.30002.
Hydrogen ions reduce ion flux through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels by binding to a single protonation site with an unusually high pKa. Recent evidence localizes the protonation site to the same locus that supports high affinity Ca2+ binding and selectivity, a set of four conserved glutamate residues near the external mouth of the pore. Remaining controversy concerns the question of whether the protonation site arises from a single glutamate, Glu-1086 (EIII), or a combination of Glu-1086 and Glu-334 (EI) working in concert. We tested these hypotheses with individual Glu --> Asp substitutions. The Glu --> Asp replacements in repeats I and III stood out in two ways. First, in both EID and EIIID, protonation was destabilized relative to wild type, whereas it was unchanged in EIID and stabilized in EIVD. The changes in affinity were entirely due to alterations in H+ off-rate. Second, the ratio of protonated conductance to deprotonated conductance was significantly closer to unity for EID and EIIID than for wild-type channels or other Asp mutants. Both results support the idea that EI and EIII act together to stabilize a single titratable H+ ion and behave nearly symmetrically in influencing pore conductance. Neutralization of EIII by alanine replacement clearly failed to abolish susceptibility to protonation, indicating that no single glutamate was absolutely required. Taken together, all the evidence supports a model in which multiple carboxylates work in concert to form a single high affinity protonation site.
氢离子通过与一个具有异常高pKa值的单质子化位点结合,减少了通过电压门控Ca2+通道的离子通量。最近的证据表明,质子化位点位于支持高亲和力Ca2+结合和选择性的同一位置,即孔外部口附近的一组四个保守谷氨酸残基。仍然存在的争议涉及质子化位点是由单个谷氨酸Glu-1086(EIII)产生,还是Glu-1086和Glu-334(EI)协同作用的组合产生的问题。我们用单个Glu→Asp替换来测试这些假设。重复序列I和III中的Glu→Asp替换在两个方面表现突出。首先,在EID和EIIID中,相对于野生型,质子化不稳定,而在EIID中不变,在EIVD中稳定。亲和力的变化完全是由于H+解离速率的改变。其次,EID和EIIID的质子化电导与去质子化电导的比率比野生型通道或其他Asp突变体更接近1。这两个结果都支持EI和EIII共同作用以稳定单个可滴定H+离子并在影响孔电导方面表现出近乎对称行为的观点。用丙氨酸替换使EIII中和显然未能消除对质子化的敏感性,表明没有单个谷氨酸是绝对必需的。综上所述,所有证据都支持一个模型,即多个羧酸盐协同作用形成一个单一的高亲和力质子化位点。