Montanes P, Goldblum M C, Boller F
U.324 INSERM, Paris, France.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995 Jan;1(1):39-48. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700000084.
Several studies of semantic abilities in Dementia of the Alzheimer Type (DAT) suggest that their semantic disorders may affect specific categories of knowledge. In particular, the existence of a category-specific semantic impairment affecting, selectively, living things has frequently been reported in association with DAT. We report here results from two naming tasks of 25 DAT patients and two subgroups within this population. The first naming task used 48 black and white line drawings from Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) which controlled the visual complexity of stimuli from living and nonliving categories. The second task used 44 colored pictures (to assess the influence of word frequency in living vs. nonliving categories). Within the set of black and white pictures, both DAT patients and controls obtained significantly lower scores on high visual complexity stimuli than on stimuli of low visual complexity. A clear effect of semantic category emerged for DAT patients and controls, with a lower performance on the living category. Within the colored set, pictures corresponding to high frequency words gave rise to significantly higher scores than pictures corresponding to low frequency words. No significant difference emerged between living versus nonliving categories, either in DAT patients or in controls. In the two tasks, the two subgroups of DAT patients presented a different profile of performance and error type. As color constitutes the main difference between the two sets of pictures, our results point to the relevance of this cue in the processing of semantic information, with visual complexity and frequency also being very relevant.
几项针对阿尔茨海默病型痴呆(DAT)语义能力的研究表明,他们的语义障碍可能会影响特定类别的知识。特别是,经常有报道称,与DAT相关联的存在一种选择性影响生物的类别特异性语义损伤。我们在此报告了25名DAT患者以及该群体中的两个亚组在两项命名任务中的结果。第一项命名任务使用了来自斯诺德格拉斯和范德瓦特(1980年)的48幅黑白线条图,这些图控制了生物和非生物类别刺激的视觉复杂性。第二项任务使用了44幅彩色图片(以评估生物与非生物类别中词频的影响)。在黑白图片组中,DAT患者和对照组在高视觉复杂性刺激上的得分显著低于低视觉复杂性刺激。对于DAT患者和对照组而言,语义类别产生了明显影响,在生物类别上表现较差。在彩色图片组中,高频词对应的图片得分显著高于低频词对应的图片。无论是DAT患者还是对照组,生物与非生物类别之间均未出现显著差异。在这两项任务中,DAT患者的两个亚组呈现出不同的表现特征和错误类型。由于颜色是两组图片的主要差异,我们的结果表明该线索在语义信息处理中具有相关性,视觉复杂性和词频也非常相关。