Vitale R J, Mussoline G R, Rinehimer K A
Environmental Standards, Inc., 1140 Valley Forge Road, Valley Forge, Pennsylvania 19482-0911, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1997 Aug;26(1 Pt 2):S80-5. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1997.1144.
Historical uses of chromium have resulted in its widespread release into the environment. In recent years, a significant amount of research has evaluated the impact of chromium on human health and the environment. Additionally, numerous analytical methods have been developed to identify and quantitate chromium in environmental media in response to various state and federal mandates such as CERCLA, RCRA, CWA, CAA, and SWDA. Due to the significant toxicity differences between trivalent [Cr(III)] and hexavalent [Cr(VI)] chromium, it is essential that chromium be quantified in these two distinct valence states to assess the potential risks to exposure to each in environmental media. Speciation is equally important because of their marked differences in environmental behavior. As the knowledge of risks associated with each valence state has grown and regulatory requirements have evolved, methods to accurately quantitate these species at ever-decreasing concentrations within environmental media have also evolved. This paper addresses the challenges of chromium species quantitation and some of the most relevant current methods used for environmental monitoring, including ASTM Method D5281 for air, SW-846 Methods 3060A, 7196A and 7199 for soils, sediments, and waste, and U.S. EPA Method 218.6 for water.
铬的历史用途导致其广泛释放到环境中。近年来,大量研究评估了铬对人类健康和环境的影响。此外,为响应各种州和联邦法规,如《综合环境反应、赔偿和责任法》(CERCLA)、《资源保护和回收法》(RCRA)、《清洁水法》(CWA)、《清洁空气法》(CAA)和《固体废弃物处置法》(SWDA),已开发出许多分析方法来识别和定量环境介质中的铬。由于三价铬[Cr(III)]和六价铬[Cr(VI)]的毒性差异很大,因此必须对这两种不同价态的铬进行定量,以评估环境介质中每种铬暴露的潜在风险。形态分析同样重要,因为它们在环境行为上存在显著差异。随着对每种价态相关风险的认识不断增加以及监管要求的演变,在环境介质中以不断降低的浓度准确定量这些形态的方法也在不断发展。本文探讨了铬形态定量的挑战以及目前用于环境监测的一些最相关方法,包括空气中的ASTM方法D5281、土壤、沉积物和废物中的SW - 846方法3060A、7196A和7199,以及水中的美国环境保护局方法218.6。