Suppr超能文献

氟乐灵的环境归宿

Environmental fate of trifluralin.

作者信息

Grover R, Wolt J D, Cessna A J, Schiefer H B

机构信息

Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Regina, Saskatchewan.

出版信息

Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 1997;153:1-64. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2302-3_1.

Abstract

Trifluralin, a preemergence, soil-applied and soil-incorporated herbicide, has been in agricultural use since 1963. The environmental chemistry and fate of dinitroaniline herbicides, including trifluralin, has been studied extensively in agricultural soils. Probst et al. (1975) and Helling (1976) have summarized pre-1975 data on the mobility, persistence, and degradation or metabolism of dinitroaniline herbicides as a group. Since then, numerous studies have been carried out on the fate of dinitroanilines, especially trifluralin, in the environment to understand further their degradation in soil, potential for mobility and persistence, and environmental concentration in water and air. The present review, while summarizing briefly earlier data, concentrates primarily on the post-1975 data on degradation, mobility, and persistence of trifluralin in soils and its potential concentrations in water and air. Trifluralin is readily degraded under sunlight in all media, with half-lives (t1/2) of minutes to several months, depending on the substrate. In addition, other dissipation processes, such as microbial and chemical, are also operative in soils, water, and sediments. Several degradation products of trifluralin have been identified and characterized, both under photolysis and following aerobic and anaerobic metabolism in soils and water-sediment systems. The differences between various degradative pathways of trifluralin appear to be more quantitative than qualitative in nature, leading eventually to the same end products that are subject to binding or mineralization with time. The general lack of accumulation of the breakdown products of trifluralin suggests that these are also subject to the same degradative mechanisms as the parent compound. Trifluralin has low water solubility and is strongly bound to soil components; mean Koc values range from 4,000 to 13,000. Once applied and incorporated into the soil, trifluralin remains relatively immobile with minimal or no potential for contamination of groundwaters under or near the treated zones. Trifluralin residues in soil surface layers are subject to loss via transport in runoff water or volatilization into the air. Seasonal losses in surface runoff are consistently less than 0.5% of the amounts applied, with concentrations in edge-of-the-field run-off water typically < 1.0 microgram L-1. Consequently, trifluralin is infrequently detected in surface waters and, if present, usually occurs below levels of quantification. Seasonal trifluralin losses into the atmosphere can be as high as 25% of that applied. Maximum trifluralin residues in the air above treated fields are in the 2-3 micrograms m-3 range following application, decreasing to < 100 ng m-3 in ambient air of intensive use areas, indicating its rapid dissipation in air. Trifluralin residues at < 100 pg m-3 in the atmosphere of remote nonuse regions have been reported, suggesting its potential for long-range transport. However, there is a general lack of understanding of the mechanisms controlling its potential for long-distance transport, especially considering its rapid photodegradation in vapor and solution states. The persistence of trifluralin in agricultural soils following incorporation is highly variable, depending on several factors such as depth of incorporation, soil moisture, soil temperature, soil air, and soil organic matter content. Estimated half-lives under a variety of agronomic conditions range from 25 to > 201 d, thus categorizing its persistence from 'moderate' to 'persistent'. The estimated half-life data for trifluralin under agronomic conditions, however, cannot be extrapolated to other potential scenarios, such as its dissipation in nontarget areas where trifluralin residues, if any, are essentially deposited on surfaces. Surface deposits on nontarget areas, unlike soil-incorporated residues, would be subject to volatilization and photolysis and thus more short lived. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

摘要

氟乐灵是一种苗前使用、土壤施用和土壤混拌的除草剂,自1963年起用于农业生产。包括氟乐灵在内的二硝基苯胺类除草剂的环境化学和归宿已在农业土壤中得到广泛研究。普罗布斯特等人(1975年)和赫林(1976年)总结了1975年以前关于二硝基苯胺类除草剂作为一个整体的迁移性、持久性以及降解或代谢的数据。从那时起,人们对二硝基苯胺类,尤其是氟乐灵在环境中的归宿进行了大量研究,以进一步了解它们在土壤中的降解、迁移和持久性潜力以及在水和空气中的环境浓度。本综述在简要总结早期数据的同时,主要集中于1975年以后关于氟乐灵在土壤中的降解、迁移和持久性及其在水和空气中的潜在浓度的数据。氟乐灵在所有介质中在阳光下都很容易降解,半衰期(t1/2)从几分钟到几个月不等,这取决于底物。此外,其他消散过程,如微生物和化学过程,在土壤、水和沉积物中也起作用。在光解以及在土壤和水 - 沉积物系统中的好氧和厌氧代谢之后,已经鉴定并表征了氟乐灵的几种降解产物。氟乐灵各种降解途径之间的差异在本质上似乎更多是定量的,最终导致相同的终产物,这些终产物会随着时间的推移而发生结合或矿化。氟乐灵分解产物普遍缺乏积累表明这些产物也与母体化合物一样受到相同的降解机制作用。氟乐灵水溶性低,与土壤成分强烈结合;平均分配系数(Koc)值范围为4000至13000。一旦施用并混入土壤中,氟乐灵相对不易移动,在处理区域下方或附近的地下水受到污染的可能性极小或不存在。土壤表层中的氟乐灵残留会通过径流水中的运输或挥发到空气中而损失。地表径流中的季节性损失始终小于施用量的0.5%,田边径流水中的浓度通常<1.0微克/升。因此,在地表水中很少检测到氟乐灵,如果存在,通常也低于定量水平。氟乐灵向大气中的季节性损失可能高达施用量的25%。施药后处理田上方空气中的氟乐灵最大残留量在2 - 3微克/立方米范围内,在 intensive use areas(此处原文有误,推测可能是intensive use areas,意为集约使用地区)的环境空气中降至<100纳克/立方米,表明其在空气中迅速消散。据报道,在偏远非使用地区的大气中氟乐灵残留量<100皮克/立方米,这表明它有远距离传输的潜力。然而,人们普遍缺乏对控制其远距离传输潜力机制的了解,特别是考虑到它在气态和溶液状态下的快速光降解。氟乐灵混入土壤后在农业土壤中的持久性变化很大,这取决于几个因素,如混入深度、土壤湿度、土壤温度、土壤空气和土壤有机质含量。在各种农艺条件下估计的半衰期范围从25天到>201天,因此将其持久性归类为“中等”到“持久”。然而,氟乐灵在农艺条件下的估计半衰期数据不能外推到其他潜在情况,例如它在非目标区域的消散,在非目标区域如果有氟乐灵残留,基本上沉积在表面。与混入土壤中的残留不同,非目标区域的表面沉积物会受到挥发和光解作用,因此寿命更短。(摘要截断)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验