Valenstein M, Dalack G, Blow F, Figueroa S, Standiford C, Douglass A
Psychiatry Service, SMITREC Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Nov;12(11):679-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07141.x.
To determine 1) if the PRIME-MD, a two-step screening and diagnostic instrument for psychiatric disorders, increases diagnosis and intervention when actively implemented in a busy general medicine clinic, and 2) the type of staff support required to achieve sufficient implementation to realize gains in diagnosis and treatment.
We introduced the PRIME-MD into a large general medicine clinic with repeated rotation of four support conditions for implementation: (1) no support, (2) nonclinical staff support (NCSS), (3) nursing staff (RN) support, and (4) a written "Prompt" condition.
Patients (N = 2,263) attending a general medicine clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Outcome measures were (1) PRIME-MD questionnaire and interview use, (2) overall psychiatric diagnosis, (3) new psychiatric diagnosis, and (4) provider intervention for psychiatric conditions. The NCSS, RN support, and prompt conditions resulted in similar rates of questionnaire use but significantly different rates of structured interview use. The NCSS condition was associated with significant increases in new diagnosis, and the RN support and Prompt condition were associated with significant increases in new diagnosis and intervention compared with no support.
Nursing staff support resulted in sufficient PRIME-MD implementation to achieve gains in both new diagnosis and provider intervention compared with no support. These gains occurred in a busy primary care clinic with nonselected providers and customary visit lengths. This level of support should be achievable in most clinical settings.
确定1)用于精神疾病的两步筛查和诊断工具PRIME-MD在繁忙的普通内科诊所积极实施时,是否能增加诊断和干预;2)实现足够的实施以在诊断和治疗方面取得成效所需的工作人员支持类型。
我们将PRIME-MD引入一家大型普通内科诊所,针对实施情况反复轮转四种支持条件:(1)无支持,(2)非临床工作人员支持(NCSS),(3)护理人员(RN)支持,以及(4)书面“提示”条件。
在一家退伍军人事务医疗中心普通内科诊所就诊的患者(N = 2263)。
结果测量指标为(1)PRIME-MD问卷和访谈的使用情况,(2)总体精神疾病诊断,(3)新的精神疾病诊断,以及(4)针对精神疾病状况的提供者干预。NCSS、RN支持和提示条件导致问卷使用率相似,但结构化访谈使用率差异显著。与无支持相比,NCSS条件与新诊断的显著增加相关,RN支持和提示条件与新诊断和干预的显著增加相关。
与无支持相比,护理人员支持导致PRIME-MD得到充分实施,从而在新诊断和提供者干预方面均取得成效。这些成效出现在一家繁忙的初级保健诊所,该诊所的提供者未经挑选且就诊时间为常规时长。这种支持水平在大多数临床环境中应该是可以实现的。