Duboeuf F, Hans D, Schott A M, Kotzki P O, Favier F, Marcelli C, Meunier P J, Delmas P D
INSERM Research Unit 403, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Nov;12(11):1895-902. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.11.1895.
We used an experimental software measuring the hip axis length (HAL) and bone mineral density (BMD) in specific regions of the lower and upper part of the femoral neck on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. To determine whether these parameters were significant predictors of the type of hip fracture, we measured 167 healthy women (controls), 24 women with trochanteric, and 42 women with cervical hip fractures within the EPIDOS prospective cohort. EPIDOS is a multicenter prospective study on risk factors for hip fracture performed in 7575 elderly women living at home, aged 75-95 and conducted in five French centers (Amiens, Lyon, Montpellier, Paris, Toulouse). Measurements were performed on data acquired at baseline before the occurrence of fracture. In the cervical fracture group, HAL was significantly longer than in controls (94.2 vs. 92.3, p = 0.03), and the associated odds ratio (OR) adjusted for age, weight, and total femoral neck BMD was significant (OR = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-2.55). In contrast, HAL was not significantly different from controls in the trochanteric fracture group. Femoral neck diameter was not a predictor of fracture. The upper and lower femoral neck BMD was lower in the trochanteric fracture group than in controls, and both measurements predicted trochanteric femoral neck fracture. In contrast, the prediction of cervical femoral neck fracture was enhanced by measuring only the upper part of the femoral neck (OR = 2.79 vs. 1.97 for the total femoral neck) while BMD of the lower part was not different from controls. Hip axis length is a predictor of femoral neck fracture. Femoral neck BMD distribution is different between cervical and trochanteric fractures. These results support the hypothesis of a different pathophysiological mechanism between the two types of hip fractures.
我们使用了一款实验软件,该软件可在双能X线吸收测定扫描中测量股骨颈上下特定区域的髋轴长度(HAL)和骨密度(BMD)。为了确定这些参数是否是髋部骨折类型的显著预测指标,我们在EPIDOS前瞻性队列中测量了167名健康女性(对照组)、24名转子间骨折女性和42名股骨颈骨折女性。EPIDOS是一项针对髋部骨折危险因素的多中心前瞻性研究,该研究在法国五个中心(亚眠、里昂、蒙彼利埃、巴黎、图卢兹)对7575名年龄在75至95岁的居家老年女性进行。测量是基于骨折发生前基线时获取的数据进行的。在股骨颈骨折组中,HAL显著长于对照组(94.2对92.3,p = 0.03),经年龄、体重和股骨颈总骨密度调整后的相关优势比(OR)具有显著性(OR = 1.64,95%置信区间[CI] 1.06 - 2.55)。相比之下,转子间骨折组的HAL与对照组无显著差异。股骨颈直径不是骨折的预测指标。转子间骨折组股骨颈上下部的骨密度低于对照组,这两项测量均能预测转子间股骨颈骨折。相反,仅测量股骨颈上部可增强对股骨颈骨折的预测(总股骨颈的OR = 2.79对1.97),而下部骨密度与对照组无差异。髋轴长度是股骨颈骨折的预测指标。股骨颈骨折和转子间骨折的骨密度分布不同。这些结果支持了两种类型髋部骨折具有不同病理生理机制的假设。