Schott A M, Hans D, Duboeuf F, Dargent-Molina P, Hajri T, Bréart G, Meunier P J
Département d'Information Médicale des Hospices Civils de Lyon, 162 avenue Lacassagne, 69424 Lyon Cedex 03, France.
Bone. 2005 Dec;37(6):858-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.024. Epub 2005 Oct 14.
Hip fractures can be separated into cervical and trochanteric fractures. Trochanteric fractures have been associated with up to twice the short-term mortality of cervical fractures in the elderly. There is also evidence suggesting that the mechanisms are different. Evidence from the literature remains limited on the predictive power of bone mineral density (BMD) and quantitative ultrasounds (QUS) for both types of hip fractures.
5703 elderly women aged 75 years or more, who were recruited from the voting lists in the EPIDOS study, and had baseline calcaneal ultrasounds (QUS) and DXA measurements at the hip and the whole body, were analyzed in this paper. Among those, 192 hip fractures occurred during an average follow-up of 4 years, 108 cervical and 84 trochanteric fractures.
Femoral neck, trochanteric and whole body BMD were able to predict trochanteric hip fracture (RR's and 95% CI were, respectively, 3.2 (2.4-4.2); 4.8 (3.5-6.6); and 2.8 (2.2-3.6)) more accurately than cervical fractures (respectively, 2.1 (1.7-2.7); 2.3 (1.8-3.0); 1.2 (1.0-1.6)). All ultrasound parameters, SOS, BUA, and stiffness index (SI) were significant predictors of trochanteric (RR's respectively 3.0 (2.2-4.1), 2.5(2.0-3.1), and 3.5(2.6-4.7)) but not cervical fractures. After adjustment for femoral neck or trochanteric BMD ultrasound parameters were still significant predictors of trochanteric fracture, and stiffness tended to be a better predictor of trochanteric fractures than either BUA or SOS with a relative risk of 2.25 (1.6-3.1).
A significant decrease of all bone measurements, BMD and QUS, was highly predictive of trochanteric fractures, whereas a decrease of femoral neck and trochanteric BMD were only associated with a slight increase in cervical fracture risk and a low total body BMD or QUS parameters were not significant predictors of cervical fractures. In women who sustained a hip fracture, the decrease of BMD and QUS values increases the risk of trochanteric fracture as compared to cervical fracture. Trochanteric fractures were mostly a consequence of a generalized low BMD and QUS, whereas other parameters might be involved in cervical fractures.
髋部骨折可分为股骨颈骨折和转子间骨折。在老年人中,转子间骨折的短期死亡率高达股骨颈骨折的两倍。也有证据表明两者的发病机制不同。关于骨密度(BMD)和定量超声(QUS)对这两种髋部骨折的预测能力,文献中的证据仍然有限。
本文分析了从EPIDOS研究的投票名单中招募的5703名75岁及以上的老年女性,她们在基线时进行了跟骨超声(QUS)以及髋部和全身的双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量。其中,在平均4年的随访期间发生了192例髋部骨折,108例股骨颈骨折和84例转子间骨折。
股骨颈、转子间和全身骨密度比股骨颈骨折更能准确预测转子间髋部骨折(相对危险度及95%可信区间分别为:3.2(2.4 - 4.2);4.8(3.5 - 6.6);2.8(2.2 - 3.6))(分别为:2.1(1.7 - 2.7);2.3(1.8 - 3.0);1.2(1.0 - 1.6))。所有超声参数,即声速(SOS)、宽带超声衰减(BUA)和硬度指数(SI)都是转子间骨折的显著预测指标(相对危险度分别为3.0(2.2 - 4.1)、2.5(2.0 - 3.1)和3.5(2.6 - 4.7)),但不是股骨颈骨折的预测指标。在调整股骨颈或转子间骨密度后,超声参数仍是转子间骨折的显著预测指标,并且硬度指数比BUA或SOS更倾向于是转子间骨折的更好预测指标,相对危险度为2.25(1.6 - 3.1)。
所有骨测量指标,即骨密度和定量超声的显著降低高度预测转子间骨折,而股骨颈和转子间骨密度的降低仅与股骨颈骨折风险的轻微增加相关,全身骨密度或定量超声参数较低不是股骨颈骨折的显著预测指标。在发生髋部骨折的女性中,与股骨颈骨折相比,骨密度和定量超声值的降低增加了转子间骨折的风险。转子间骨折主要是全身骨密度和定量超声普遍降低的结果,而股骨颈骨折可能涉及其他参数。