• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加利福尼亚心理调查表的敌意量表:明尼苏达多项人格测验、观察者Q分类法及大五人格相关因素

A hostility scale for the California Psychological Inventory: MMPI, observer Q-sort, and big-five correlates.

作者信息

Adams S H, John O P

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of California at Berkeley, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1997 Oct;69(2):408-24. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6902_11.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa6902_11
PMID:9392898
Abstract

Using two samples, we developed and validated a hostility scale that can be scored from the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) and serves as an alternate for the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale (Ho; Cook & Medley, 1954). The CPI Hostility (H) scale consists of 33 items that are either duplicates or close equivalents of specific Ho items, and the two scales correlate at least .90 in samples differing in sex. The H and Ho scales show a similar pattern of correlations with conceptually relevant MMPI scales and with observer-rated personality attributes tapping Barefoot, Peterson, et al.'s (1991) five hostility categories of Hostile Affect, Cynicism, Aggressive Responding, Social Avoidance, and Hostile Attributions. These findings provide evidence for the equivalence of the two hostility scales, as well as external validation for those personality characteristics that are purported to underlie the construct of hostility as tapped by both the original Ho scale and the new CPI H scale.

摘要

我们使用两个样本开发并验证了一种敌意量表,该量表可根据加利福尼亚心理调查表(CPI)进行计分,并可作为库克 - 梅德利敌意量表(Ho;库克和梅德利,1954年)的替代量表。CPI敌意(H)量表由33个项目组成,这些项目要么是特定Ho项目的重复项,要么是其近似等效项,并且在不同性别的样本中,这两个量表的相关性至少为0.90。H量表和Ho量表与概念上相关的明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)量表以及与观察者评定的人格属性之间呈现出相似的相关模式,这些人格属性体现了巴尔富特、彼得森等人(1991年)提出的敌意的五个类别,即敌意情绪、愤世嫉俗、攻击性反应、社交回避和敌意归因。这些发现为两种敌意量表的等效性提供了证据,同时也为那些据称构成原始Ho量表和新CPI H量表所测量的敌意结构基础的人格特征提供了外部验证。

相似文献

1
A hostility scale for the California Psychological Inventory: MMPI, observer Q-sort, and big-five correlates.加利福尼亚心理调查表的敌意量表:明尼苏达多项人格测验、观察者Q分类法及大五人格相关因素
J Pers Assess. 1997 Oct;69(2):408-24. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6902_11.
2
Psychometric characteristics of the MMPI-2 Cook-Medley Hostility scale.明尼苏达多项人格测验第二版(MMPI-2)库克-梅德利敌意量表的心理测量特征。
J Pers Assess. 1995 Dec;65(3):567-85. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_15.
3
Three narcissism scales for the California Q-set.用于加州Q分类法的三种自恋量表。
J Pers Assess. 1992 Feb;58(1):51-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5801_5.
4
A depressive symptom scale for the California Psychological Inventory: construct validation of the CPI-D.加利福尼亚心理调查表的抑郁症状量表:CPI-D的结构效度验证
Psychol Assess. 2004 Sep;16(3):299-309. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.299.
5
New narcissism scales for the California Psychological Inventory and MMPI.加利福尼亚心理调查表和明尼苏达多项人格调查表的新自恋量表。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Summer;54(3-4):446-62. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674010.
6
The Cook-Medley hostility scale: item content and ability to predict survival.库克-梅德利敌意量表:项目内容及预测生存率的能力。
Psychosom Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;51(1):46-57. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198901000-00005.
7
Cognitive, behavioral, and affective correlates of the Cook and Medley Hostility Scale.库克与梅德利敌意量表的认知、行为及情感相关因素
J Pers Assess. 1990 Summer;54(3-4):501-14. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674015.
8
MMPI and MMPI-2 scores on the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale.明尼苏达多项人格测验(MMPI)及明尼苏达多项人格测验第二版(MMPI-2)在库克-梅德利敌意量表上的得分。
Psychol Rep. 1997 Jun;80(3 Pt 2):1087-90. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1997.80.3c.1087.
9
Assessing the MMPI-based Cook-Medley Hostility Scale: the implications of dimensionality.评估基于明尼苏达多相人格调查表的库克-梅德利敌意量表:维度的影响
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Jun;70(6):1281-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.6.1281.
10
Comparative validity of MMPI-2 and MCMI-II personality disorder classifications.明尼苏达多项人格调查表-2(MMPI-2)与米隆临床多轴问卷-Ⅱ(MCMI-Ⅱ)人格障碍分类的比较效度
J Pers Assess. 1996 Jun;66(3):569-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6603_7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cyberloafing to Escape From the "Devil": Investigating the Impact of Abusive Supervision From the Third-Party Perspective.通过网络偷懒逃避“恶魔”:从第三方视角调查虐待性监督的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 4;12:722063. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722063. eCollection 2021.
2
The Influence of Mistreatment by Patients on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention among Chinese Nurses: A Three-Wave Survey.患者虐待对中国护士工作满意度和离职意愿的影响:一项三波调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 15;17(4):1256. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041256.
3
Is It Me or You?-How Reactions to Abusive Supervision Are Shaped by Leader Behavior and Follower Perceptions.
是我还是你?——领导者行为与下属认知如何塑造对辱虐管理的反应
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 27;9:1309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01309. eCollection 2018.
4
Effect of Perceived Negative Workplace Gossip on Employees' Behaviors.感知到的负面职场流言蜚语对员工行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 12;9:1112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01112. eCollection 2018.