Tarif N, Bakris G L
Nephrology Division, University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago, USA.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997 Nov;12(11):2244-50. doi: 10.1093/ndt/12.11.2244.
The vast majority of animal data derived from models of either remnant kidney or diabetes demonstrate that dihydropyridine (nifedipine-like) calcium-channel blockers (DHPCCBs) effectively reduce arterial pressure but do not significantly affect proteinuria nor prevent development of glomerular scarring. Conversely, the non-DHPCCBs such as diltiazem and verapamil blunt both the rise in proteinuria as well as mesangial matrix expansion and subsequent glomerular scarring in diabetes. Additionally, the non-DHPCCBs markedly attenuate development of glomerular scarring in the remnant kidney model. The primary reasons for these differences between subclasses of CCBs relates to a lack of the following attributes by DHPCCBs: (1) they fail to reduce glomerular membrane permeability which is increased in these models; (2) they fail to affect the synthesis of certain key matrix proteins that perpetuate development of glomerular scarring (this effect may be due to the differential expression of calcium channels within the glomerular mesangium); and (3) the DHPCCBs totally abolish renal autoregulation in these models, an effect not observed with non-DHPCCBs. Taken together with long-term (> 3 year) clinical studies, primarily in diabetic nephropathy, it is clear that the non-DHPCCBs seem to offer protection to the kidney not available with DHPCCBs alone, unless systolic arterial pressure is reduced to levels of < or = 110 mmHg.
绝大多数来自动物残肾模型或糖尿病模型的数据表明,二氢吡啶类(硝苯地平样)钙通道阻滞剂(DHPCCBs)能有效降低动脉血压,但对蛋白尿无显著影响,也不能预防肾小球瘢痕形成。相反,地尔硫䓬和维拉帕米等非二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂既能抑制糖尿病中蛋白尿的增加以及系膜基质扩张和随后的肾小球瘢痕形成,还能在残肾模型中显著减轻肾小球瘢痕形成。CCB亚类之间存在这些差异的主要原因在于DHPCCBs缺乏以下特性:(1)它们无法降低这些模型中升高的肾小球膜通透性;(2)它们无法影响某些促进肾小球瘢痕形成的关键基质蛋白的合成(这种作用可能归因于肾小球系膜内钙通道的差异表达);(3)DHPCCBs在这些模型中完全消除了肾自身调节,而非二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂未观察到这种作用。结合主要针对糖尿病肾病的长期(>3年)临床研究来看,很明显,非二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂似乎能为肾脏提供仅用DHPCCBs无法实现的保护,除非收缩压降至≤110 mmHg。