Suppr超能文献

精神病学研究中的健康对照受试者:冲动性与志愿者偏差。

The healthy control subject in psychiatric research: impulsiveness and volunteer bias.

作者信息

Gustavsson J P, Asberg M, Schalling D

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Nov;96(5):325-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09924.x.

Abstract

Exciting and demanding biomedical experiments may attract a specific subgroup of people as volunteers. In the present study of selection bias, subjects volunteering in a psychobiological study that included a potentially painful procedure (lumbar puncture) were compared with those who declined to participate, with regard to scores on personality scales administered during a previous investigation of the same subjects. Significant differences were found on the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and Karolinska Scales of Personality Impulsiveness scale, suggesting an over-representation of impulsive individuals among the volunteers. If the specific subject of investigation has implications for the type of individual who will participate as a healthy volunteer in biomedical research, variation will be introduced, affecting the independent variable, and the conclusions that can be drawn from such research may be questionable.

摘要

令人兴奋且要求颇高的生物医学实验可能会吸引特定的一群人作为志愿者。在当前关于选择偏倚的研究中,将参与一项包含潜在痛苦程序(腰椎穿刺)的心理生物学研究的志愿者受试者,与拒绝参与的受试者,就同一批受试者在先前调查中所进行的人格量表得分进行了比较。在艾森克人格问卷和卡罗林斯卡人格冲动性量表上发现了显著差异,这表明志愿者中冲动型个体的比例过高。如果调查的特定主题对将作为健康志愿者参与生物医学研究的个体类型有影响,就会引入变异性,影响自变量,并且从这类研究中得出的结论可能值得怀疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验