Huang W F, Yang M Q, Zeng J, Li L Z, Cheng G R
Department of Clinical Laboratory of Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, China.
Rinsho Byori. 1997 Nov;45(11):1098-102.
We examined the differences in molar absorptivity of 4-NP obtained using different kits for ALP measurement and different instruments. The apparent molar absorptivity of 4-NP in the same reaction solution determined by six different instruments was 15.98, 16.72, 16.06, 17.00, 16.27, 17.62 and that using four different reaction solution kits for ALP with the same instrument was 16.90, 17.38, 17.72, 16.11. We measured ALP in three serum samples with six instruments using the same kit and in twelve serum samples with the same instrument using four kits. ALP activities measured using the same molar absorptivity value differed with the instrument(p < 0.01). However, those measured using the apparent molar absorptivity value for each instrument revealed no significant differences(p > 0.05). In conclusion, we suggest that standard material should be contained in each kit for enzyme measurement and the apparent epsilon for each kit and instrument should be obtained to minimize the systematic error caused by using the same epsilon in different laboratories.
我们研究了使用不同的碱性磷酸酶(ALP)检测试剂盒和不同仪器所测得的4-硝基苯酚(4-NP)摩尔吸光系数的差异。用六种不同仪器测定同一反应溶液中4-NP的表观摩尔吸光系数分别为15.98、16.72、16.06、17.00、16.27、17.62,而用同一仪器检测碱性磷酸酶的四种不同反应溶液试剂盒所测得的结果分别为16.90、17.38、17.72、16.11。我们用同一试剂盒通过六种仪器测定了三份血清样本中的碱性磷酸酶,并用同一仪器通过四种试剂盒测定了十二份血清样本中的碱性磷酸酶。使用相同摩尔吸光系数值测得的碱性磷酸酶活性因仪器不同而有差异(p < 0.01)。然而,使用各仪器的表观摩尔吸光系数值测得的结果并无显著差异(p > 0.05)。总之,我们建议酶检测的每个试剂盒中都应包含标准物质,并且应获取每个试剂盒和仪器的表观ε值,以尽量减少不同实验室使用相同ε值所导致的系统误差。