Trede I
Pflege. 1997 Oct;10(5):262-72.
This paper takes a close look at nursing publications that are concerned with the theoretical knowledge of "standards". The central question is: "What are the intentions and characteristics to which standards are linked in nursing literature?" Diverse definitions and synonyms of standards are discussed as well. There is a considerable irregularity in the terminology of standards and similar terms in the investigated literature. Therefore, the term "standard" is treated by the author as a general one that embraces many definitions and has to be differentiated for a closer approach. Thus, four different kinds of features have been developed in the course of the analytic work: "intentions", "range of validity", "contents" and "structure". These four areas form a basis for a more definite description of the various kinds of standards. Based on her findings, the author give recommendations on how the actual linguistic confusion can be effectively dealt with.
本文深入研究了与“标准”理论知识相关的护理出版物。核心问题是：“护理文献中与标准相关的意图和特征是什么？”同时也讨论了标准的各种定义和同义词。在所研究的文献中，标准及类似术语的用词存在相当大的不规范性。因此，作者将“标准”一词视为一个涵盖多种定义的通用术语，为更深入探讨需对其进行区分。在分析过程中，形成了四种不同类型的特征：“意图”“有效性范围”“内容”和“结构”。这四个方面为更确切地描述各类标准奠定了基础。基于研究结果，作者就如何有效应对当前的语言混乱问题提出了建议。
