• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘患儿护理标准的内容效度验证。

Content validation of standards of nursing care for the child with asthma.

作者信息

Larter N L, Kieckhefer G, Paeth S T

机构信息

Pulmonary Division, Children's Hospital & Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98105.

出版信息

J Pediatr Nurs. 1993 Feb;8(1):15-21.

PMID:8445513
Abstract

Standards of nursing care for the child with asthma were developed utilizing outcome criteria to evaluate the patient's status. These standards were submitted to three experts in the field of pulmonary nursing to enable calculation of a content validity index (CVI). The experts also provided qualitative comments to improve clarity of the standards. The CVI for the standards was 0.85. The standards were revised to reflect the CVI and the qualitative comments by the three experts.

摘要

针对哮喘患儿的护理标准是利用结果标准来制定的,用以评估患者的状况。这些标准提交给了三位肺部护理领域的专家,以计算内容效度指数(CVI)。专家们还提供了定性意见,以提高标准的清晰度。这些标准的CVI为0.85。根据CVI以及三位专家的定性意见对标准进行了修订。

相似文献

1
Content validation of standards of nursing care for the child with asthma.哮喘患儿护理标准的内容效度验证。
J Pediatr Nurs. 1993 Feb;8(1):15-21.
2
[Assessment of construct and content validity of Monitor--an index of the quality of nursing care--and the evaluation of clarity and concreteness of the criteria of Monitor].[护理质量指标监测器的结构效度和内容效度评估以及监测器标准清晰度和具体性的评价]
Hoitotiede. 1992;4(4):147-54.
3
[Research methodology for the formulation of nursing standards].[护理标准制定的研究方法]
Curationis. 1990 Dec;13(3-4):49-55.
4
[Linguistic confusion about nursing standards. A literature study].[关于护理标准的语言混淆。一项文献研究]
Pflege. 1997 Oct;10(5):262-72.
5
[Conceptual considerations on the use of nursing standards].[关于护理标准使用的概念性思考]
Pflege. 1998 Aug;11(4):199-206.
6
Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel.使用异质性专家小组确定青少年自陈式量表的内容效度。
Nurs Res. 2007 Sep-Oct;56(5):361-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000289505.30037.91.
7
[Standards for neonatal intensive care nursing: unit directed management standards].[新生儿重症监护护理标准:科室指导管理标准]
Curationis. 1999 Sep;22(3):56-64.
8
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.CVI(内容效度指数)是内容效度的可接受指标吗?评估与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.
9
[Severity of asthmatic attacks and nursing standards].[哮喘发作的严重程度与护理标准]
Kango Gijutsu. 1986 Nov;32(15):1889-91.
10
Evaluation of internet-based clinical decision support systems.基于互联网的临床决策支持系统的评估
J Med Internet Res. 1999 Oct-Dec;1(2):E6. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1.2.e6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a school- and community-based academic asthma health education program on use of effective asthma self-care behaviors in older school-age students.一项基于学校和社区的学术性哮喘健康教育项目对大龄学龄学生有效哮喘自我护理行为使用情况的效果
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2015 Jan;20(1):62-75. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12099. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
2
Effectiveness of a school-based academic asthma health education and counseling program on fostering acceptance of asthma in older school-age students with asthma.一项基于学校的学术性哮喘健康教育与咨询项目对促进大龄哮喘学龄儿童接纳哮喘的效果。
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2015 Jan;20(1):49-61. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12098. Epub 2014 Nov 30.