Duffau H, Capelle L, Sichez J P, Faillot T, Bitar A, Arthuis F, Van Effenterre R, Fohanno D
Department of Neurosurgery 1, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1997;139(10):914-22. doi: 10.1007/BF01411299.
Although intracranial cavernomas are known to cause haemorrhage, data concerning the frequency, severity and delay of recurrent bleedings are controversial. We report a series of 6 patients with histologically proven cavernoma, presenting with early clinical signs and radiological proof of rebleeding, that is occurring in the first month after initial overt haemorrhage. These 6 cases have been selected from a series of 142 patients seen between 1980 and 1995 in our department with cavernous angiomas or so-called AOVMs, of whom 93 presented with clinical symptoms of haemorrhage (34 patients presented symptoms of one or more rebleeding, but only 6 had radiological proof). All patients suffered neurological worsening due to the rebleeding, with an increase of the size of the haematoma on the CT scan. Five MRIs were performed at the acute stage: 3 showed evidence of cavernoma (60%). All patients underwent surgery at the acute stage of the rebleeding, with 5 improvements and 1 stabilization. A cavernous angioma was found in 5 cases at first surgery, but a further operation was necessary in the last patient to find and remove the cavernoma, after a second rebleeding following the first intervention. Our series reveals a high frequency of rebleeding after a first intracranial haemorrhage from a cavernous angioma, and highlights the precocity of such rebleedings. Therefore, we advocate early aggressive surgical management: in cases of cavernoma revealed by a first clinical overt haemorrhage, when there is strong radiological suspicion at the acute stage; and in all cases of rebleeding, even without radiological evidence of malformation, in the absence of vascular risk factors. Surgical indication must be discussed in particular cases of cavernomas of the brain stem when neither the haematoma nor the cavernoma reach the surface, and in deep supratentorial cavernomas, when the neurological status is good, because of the therapeutic risk.
虽然颅内海绵状血管瘤已知会引起出血,但关于复发性出血的频率、严重程度和延迟时间的数据存在争议。我们报告了一系列6例经组织学证实为海绵状血管瘤的患者,他们出现了早期临床症状和再出血的影像学证据,且再出血发生在首次明显出血后的第一个月内。这6例患者是从1980年至1995年在我们科室就诊的142例患有海绵状血管瘤或所谓的静脉畸形(AOVM)的患者中挑选出来的,其中93例出现了出血的临床症状(34例出现了一次或多次再出血的症状,但只有6例有影像学证据)。所有患者因再出血导致神经功能恶化,CT扫描显示血肿大小增加。在急性期进行了5次磁共振成像(MRI)检查:3次显示有海绵状血管瘤的证据(60%)。所有患者在再出血的急性期都接受了手术,5例病情改善,1例病情稳定。首次手术时在5例中发现了海绵状血管瘤,但最后1例患者在首次干预后发生第二次再出血,需要进一步手术以找到并切除海绵状血管瘤。我们的系列研究揭示了颅内海绵状血管瘤首次出血后再出血的高频率,并突出了此类再出血的早熟性。因此,我们主张早期积极的手术治疗:对于首次临床明显出血后发现的海绵状血管瘤,在急性期有强烈影像学怀疑时;以及在所有再出血病例中,即使没有畸形的影像学证据,且不存在血管危险因素时。对于脑干海绵状血管瘤,当血肿和海绵状血管瘤均未到达表面时,以及幕上深部海绵状血管瘤,当神经功能状态良好时,由于治疗风险,必须特别讨论手术指征。