• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨科生物可吸收骨折内固定:综述。第二部分。临床研究。

Bioresorbable fracture fixation in orthopedics: a comprehensive review. Part II. Clinical studies.

作者信息

Simon J A, Ricci J L, Di Cesare P E

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopedic Institute, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997 Nov;26(11):754-62.

PMID:9402210
Abstract

Bioresorbable materials overcome two major disadvantages of the metal alloys most commonly used in fracture-fixation devices: their extreme stiffness, which causes stress shielding of the underlying bone, and the necessity, in a significant number of cases, of removing metallic implants after fracture healing is complete. The orthopedic surgeon now has the use of polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, and polydioxanone implants for the fixation of small cancellous bone fractures. The currently available bioresorbable materials lack strength and stiffness and are associated with inflammatory reactions and osteolysis in a significant number of cases. Surgeons should use the available pins and screws with extreme care and attention to the characteristics of each individual injury, particularly its healing characteristics, as well as to the material's initial mechanical properties, degradation rates, and associated complications.

摘要

生物可吸收材料克服了骨折固定装置中最常用的金属合金的两个主要缺点

其极高的刚度会导致下方骨骼的应力遮挡,以及在大量情况下骨折愈合完成后需要取出金属植入物。骨科医生现在可以使用聚乳酸、聚乙醇酸和聚二氧杂环己酮植入物来固定小的松质骨骨折。目前可用的生物可吸收材料缺乏强度和刚度,并且在大量情况下会引发炎症反应和骨溶解。外科医生应极其小心地使用现有的钢针和螺钉,并关注每个个体损伤的特征,特别是其愈合特征,以及材料的初始力学性能、降解率和相关并发症。

相似文献

1
Bioresorbable fracture fixation in orthopedics: a comprehensive review. Part II. Clinical studies.骨科生物可吸收骨折内固定:综述。第二部分。临床研究。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997 Nov;26(11):754-62.
2
Bioresorbable fracture fixation in orthopedics: a comprehensive review. Part I. Basic science and preclinical studies.骨科生物可吸收骨折内固定:综述。第一部分。基础科学与临床前研究。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997 Oct;26(10):665-71.
3
Bioresorbable composite materials for orthopaedic devices.用于骨科器械的生物可吸收复合材料。
Med Device Technol. 2008 Sep;19(5):69-70, 72.
4
Resorbable bone fixation: its potential role in cranio-maxillofacial trauma.可吸收骨固定术:其在颅颌面创伤中的潜在作用
J Craniomaxillofac Trauma. 1996 Spring;2(1):56-60.
5
A prospective trial of poly-L-lactic/polyglycolic acid co-polymer plates and screws for internal fixation of mandibular fractures.聚-L-乳酸/聚乙醇酸共聚物接骨板和螺钉用于下颌骨骨折内固定的前瞻性试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Mar;37(3):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.11.015. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
6
Complications after zygoma fracture fixation: is there a difference between biodegradable materials and how do they compare with titanium osteosynthesis?颧骨骨折固定术后并发症:可生物降解材料之间是否存在差异,以及它们与钛质骨固定术相比如何?
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Apr;101(4):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.026. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
7
A review of locking compression plate biomechanics and their advantages as internal fixators in fracture healing.锁定加压钢板生物力学及其作为骨折愈合内固定器的优势综述。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007 Dec;22(10):1049-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
8
Rigid internal fixation with titanium versus bioresorbable miniplates in the repair of mandibular fractures in rabbits.钛质与可生物吸收微型接骨板坚固内固定修复兔下颌骨骨折的比较
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Mar;34(2):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.03.016.
9
Bone ingrowth and stress shielding with a porous surface coated fracture fixation plate.
J Biomed Mater Res. 1979 Sep;13(5):799-810. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820130510.
10
Invited review: small versus large plate fixation of mandibular fractures.特邀综述:下颌骨骨折的小钢板与大钢板固定
J Craniomaxillofac Trauma. 1999 Fall;5(3):33-9; discussion 40.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Feasibility of Internal Fixation Using Bioabsorbable Versus Titanium Materials for Short-Level Lamina Reimplantation: A Comparative Clinical Study.用于短节段椎板再植入的生物可吸收材料与钛材料内固定的安全性和可行性:一项对比临床研究
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jan;17(1):202-211. doi: 10.1111/os.14288. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Auxetic Biomedical Metamaterials for Orthopedic Surgery Applications: A Comprehensive Review.用于骨科手术应用的拉胀生物医学超材料:综述
Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(8):1801-1815. doi: 10.1111/os.14142. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
3
Vascularized bone tissue engineering: approaches for potential improvement.
血管化骨组织工程:潜在改善方法。
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012 Oct;18(5):363-82. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0012. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
4
Surgical treatment of calcaneal fractures with bioabsorbable screws.可吸收螺钉治疗跟骨骨折。
Int Orthop. 2011 Apr;35(4):529-33. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1183-5. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
5
Rapid cooling through the glass transition transiently increases ductility of PGA/PLLA copolymers: a proposed mechanism and implications for devices.通过玻璃化转变进行快速冷却会瞬时提高聚乙醇酸/聚乳酸共聚物的延展性:一种提出的机制及其对器械的影响。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 Sep;18(9):1753-63. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3047-0. Epub 2007 May 5.