Domínguez-Rodrigo M
Departamento de Prehistoria, Facultad de Geografia e Historia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
J Hum Evol. 1997 Dec;33(6):669-90. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1997.0161.
The meat-eating behavior of Plio-Pleistocene hominids, responsible for the bone accumulations at the earliest archaeological sites, is still a hotly-debated issue in paleoanthropology. In particular, meat-eating and bone marrow consumption are often presented as either complementary or opposing strategies of carcass exploitation. The presence of cut marks on fossil archeofauna is a potential source of information that has not been consistently used as evidence of carcass consumption by hominids. Some authors interpret cut marks as the result of hominids manipulating meat-bearing bones, while others argue that they can also be the result of hominids extracting marginal scraps of carcass flesh that have survived carnivores' initial consumption. In this study, a referential framework concerning the interpretation of cut marks is presented, based on a set of experiments conducted by the author. It is suggested, according to these experiments and data drawn from the FLK "Zinj" site, that hominids processed meat-bearing bones (on which flesh was abundant) rather than defleshed carcasses from felid kills.
上新世-更新世古人类的食肉行为是古人类学中一个备受争议的热点问题,这种行为导致了最早考古遗址中的骨骼堆积。特别是,食肉和食用骨髓常常被视为对尸体利用的互补或对立策略。化石动物群上切割痕迹的存在是一种潜在的信息来源,但尚未一直被用作古人类食用尸体的证据。一些作者将切割痕迹解释为古人类处理带肉骨头的结果,而另一些人则认为,它们也可能是古人类从食肉动物初次食用后剩余的少量尸体肉中提取的结果。在本研究中,基于作者进行的一系列实验,提出了一个关于切割痕迹解释的参考框架。根据这些实验以及从FLK “津吉” 遗址获取的数据表明,古人类处理的是带肉的骨头(上面有丰富的肉),而不是猫科动物捕杀后剔肉的尸体。