Winter Y, Voigt C, Von Helversen O
Institute of Zoology II, Erlangen University, Erlangen, Germany.
J Exp Biol. 1998 Jan;201(Pt 2):237-44. doi: 10.1242/jeb.201.2.237.
Glossophagine nectar-feeding bats exploit flowers while hovering in front of them. Aerodynamic theory predicts that power output for hovering flight in Glossophaga soricina is 2.6 times higher than during horizontal flight. We tested this prediction by measuring rates of gas exchange during hover-feeding. Five individuals of Glossophaga soricina (mean mass 11.7 g) were trained to feed from a nectar dispenser designed as a flow-through respirometry mask. Single hover-feeding events lasted for up to 4.5 s. Measured rates of gas exchange varied as a function of hovering duration. O2 and CO2 during short hovering events (up to 1 s) were 20.5+/-6.7 ml g-1 h-1 (N=55) and 21.6+/-5.6 ml g-1 h-1 (N=39) (means +/- S.D.), respectively. These values are in the range of a previous estimate of the metabolic power input for level forward flight (23.8 ml O2 g-1 h-1). However, during hovering events lasting longer than 3 s, oxygen uptake was only 16.7+/-3.5 ml g-1 h-1 (N=73), which is only 70 % of the value expected for forward flight. Thus, bats reduced their rate of oxygen uptake during longer periods of hovering compared with level forward flight. This result is in contrast to the predicted hovering cost derived from aerodynamic theory. The exact metabolic power input during hovering remains uncertain. During longer hovering events, bats were probably not in respiratory steady state, as indicated by the deviation of the respiratory exchange ratio from the expected value of 1 (oxidization of nectar sugar) to the measured value of 0.8.
食花蜜的舌蝠在花朵前悬停时采食花蜜。空气动力学理论预测,索氏长舌蝠悬停飞行时的功率输出比水平飞行时高2.6倍。我们通过测量悬停取食期间的气体交换速率来验证这一预测。训练了5只索氏长舌蝠(平均体重11.7克)从一个设计为流通式呼吸测量面罩的花蜜分配器取食。单次悬停取食事件持续时间长达4.5秒。测得的气体交换速率随悬停持续时间而变化。短时间悬停事件(长达1秒)期间的氧气和二氧化碳摄取量分别为20.5±6.7毫升/克·小时(N = 55)和21.6±5.6毫升/克·小时(N = 39)(平均值±标准差)。这些值在前述水平向前飞行的代谢功率输入估计值范围内(23.8毫升氧气/克·小时)。然而,在持续时间超过3秒的悬停事件中,氧气摄取量仅为16.7±3.5毫升/克·小时(N = 73),仅为向前飞行预期值的70%。因此,与水平向前飞行相比,蝙蝠在较长时间悬停期间降低了氧气摄取速率。这一结果与空气动力学理论推导的预测悬停成本相反。悬停期间的确切代谢功率输入仍不确定。在较长时间的悬停事件中,蝙蝠可能未处于呼吸稳定状态,这表现为呼吸交换率从预期值1(花蜜糖氧化)偏离至测量值0.8。