Young R F
Northwest Neurosciences Institute, Northwest Hospital, Seattle, Washington 98133, USA.
Semin Surg Oncol. 1998 Jan-Feb;14(1):70-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2388(199801/02)14:1<70::aid-ssu9>3.0.co;2-#.
Surgical resection and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) have been the mainstays of the treatment of cerebral metastases. This approach results in a median survival of about 10 months. Several recent publications and our own experience suggest that a similar median survival can be achieved with stereotactic radiosurgery using either the Leksell Gamma Knife or the linear accelerator radiosurgical techniques. In addition, radiosurgery can effectively treat metastatic tumors in surgically inaccessible sites, e.g., the brainstem. Radiosurgery can also effectively treat multiple intracranial metastases in widely separated areas of the brain. In fact, we have shown that patients with multiple metastases have similar lengths and qualities of survival as do patients with single metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. The most important predictor of success in radiosurgical treatment of cerebral metastases is the neurological status of the patient, usually expressed as the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). The histological type of primary cancer is not an outcome predictor. Even so-called "radioresistant" tumors (e.g., melanoma, renal cell) respond favorable to radiosurgery. A great benefit of radiosurgery is the virtual lack of perioperative complications and the minimal interference with quality of life compared either to surgery or to fractionated whole brain radiotherapy. Long-term complications of radiosurgery are infrequent and primarily relate to failure of local tumor control (10%) and radiation-induced edema or necrosis. The later usually can be controlled with corticosteroids, but occasionally, craniotomy may be required to treat life-threatening mass effects. We believe that radiosurgery is the treatment of choice for most cerebral metastases. Only large lesions (> 3.5-4 cm diameter) and those which require immediate decompression to treat life-threatening mass effects require surgical treatment. Radiosurgery also may be used to treat residual disease after surgical resection. We have shown that WBRT does not increase the efficacy of radiosurgery in the treatment of cerebral metastases, and, therefore, we prefer to avoid both the short- and long-term morbidity of that treatment, if possible.
手术切除和全脑放疗(WBRT)一直是脑转移瘤治疗的主要手段。这种方法的中位生存期约为10个月。最近的几篇文献以及我们自己的经验表明,使用Leksell伽玛刀或直线加速器放射外科技术进行立体定向放射外科治疗可实现相似的中位生存期。此外,放射外科可有效治疗手术难以到达部位的转移瘤,如脑干。放射外科还可有效治疗大脑广泛分隔区域的多个颅内转移瘤。事实上,我们已经表明,多发转移瘤患者与接受立体定向放射外科治疗的单发转移瘤患者的生存期长度和质量相似。脑转移瘤放射外科治疗成功的最重要预测因素是患者的神经状态,通常用卡氏功能状态评分(KPS)表示。原发癌的组织学类型不是预后预测因素。即使是所谓的“放射抗拒”肿瘤(如黑色素瘤、肾细胞癌)对放射外科治疗也有良好反应。放射外科的一大优势是几乎没有围手术期并发症,与手术或分次全脑放疗相比,对生活质量的干扰最小。放射外科的长期并发症很少见,主要与局部肿瘤控制失败(10%)以及放射诱导的水肿或坏死有关。后者通常可用皮质类固醇控制,但偶尔可能需要开颅手术来治疗危及生命的占位效应。我们认为放射外科是大多数脑转移瘤的首选治疗方法。只有大的病变(直径>3.5 - 4厘米)以及那些需要立即减压以治疗危及生命的占位效应的病变才需要手术治疗。放射外科也可用于治疗手术切除后的残留病灶。我们已经表明,WBRT不会增加放射外科治疗脑转移瘤的疗效,因此,如果可能,我们更愿意避免该治疗的短期和长期并发症。