• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较结肠肛管吻合术后小和大结肠J型贮袋临床结果的前瞻性随机研究。

Prospective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis.

作者信息

Lazorthes F, Gamagami R, Chiotasso P, Istvan G, Muhammad S

机构信息

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Dec;40(12):1409-13. doi: 10.1007/BF02070703.

DOI:10.1007/BF02070703
PMID:9407976
Abstract

PURPOSE

Improved functional results can be obtained by construction of a colonic J-pouch after coloanal anastomosis. Variability in pouch size following coloanal anastomosis is prevalent in current literature. In this study, the authors compare clinical bowel function after complete rectal excision with coloanal anastomosis for patients with rectal carcinoma using either a small 6-cm or a large 10-cm colonic J-pouch anastomosis. The clinical outcome is assessed both at short-term and long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive patients with rectal cancers 4 to 8 cm from the anal verge were recruited into the study. Patients were randomized intraoperatively to either a 6-cm J-pouch group or a 10-cm J-pouch group. Clinical assessments were performed prospectively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, following colostomy closure. Clinical parameters such as frequency, urgency, continence, and laxative and enema use were assessed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistical differences in the mean defecation frequency, urgency, and fecal continence between the two groups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. In the first year, laxative and enema use between the two groups was negligible; however at two years, 30 percent of patients with a large reservoir compared with 10 percent of patients in the small-pouch group required laxative and/or enema for constipation and evacuation of bowels.

CONCLUSION

Similar clinical results can be expected from patients with either small or large reservoirs at one year. However, with long-term follow-up, patients with a large reservoir are more likely to require medication for constipation and evacuation. To avoid these inconveniences a small reservoir is advocated for patients undergoing coloanal anastomosis.

摘要

目的

经结肠肛管吻合术构建结肠J形贮袋可改善功能结果。目前的文献中,结肠肛管吻合术后贮袋大小存在差异。在本研究中,作者比较了直肠癌患者行全直肠切除及结肠肛管吻合术时,使用6厘米小结肠J形贮袋吻合术和10厘米大结肠J形贮袋吻合术的临床肠道功能。在短期和长期随访中评估临床结果。

方法

连续纳入59例距肛缘4至8厘米的直肠癌患者进行研究。患者在术中随机分为6厘米J形贮袋组或10厘米J形贮袋组。术后在结肠造口关闭后的3、6、12和24个月进行前瞻性临床评估。评估并比较两组的临床参数,如排便频率、急迫感、控便能力以及泻药和灌肠剂的使用情况。

结果

两组在术后3、6、12和24个月时,平均排便频率、急迫感和粪便失禁方面无统计学差异。在第一年,两组使用泻药和灌肠剂的情况可忽略不计;然而在两年时,大贮袋组30%的患者与小贮袋组10%的患者因便秘和排便需要使用泻药和/或灌肠剂。

结论

一年时,无论贮袋大小,患者的临床结果相似。然而,长期随访发现,大贮袋患者更可能因便秘和排便需要用药。为避免这些不便,对于接受结肠肛管吻合术的患者,提倡使用小贮袋。

相似文献

1
Prospective, randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis.比较结肠肛管吻合术后小和大结肠J型贮袋临床结果的前瞻性随机研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Dec;40(12):1409-13. doi: 10.1007/BF02070703.
2
Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis.新直肠储袋并非结肠J形贮袋的功能原理:短结肠J形贮袋的容量与直结肠肛管吻合术并无差异。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 May;45(5):660-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6264-3.
3
Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained?直结肠肛管吻合术与结肠J形贮袋的长期功能评估:结肠J形贮袋的功能优势是否持续存在?
Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Jun;41(6):740-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02236262.
4
Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction.比较J型结肠贮袋肛管吻合术与直结肠肛管重建术的前瞻性随机试验。
Br J Surg. 1995 May;82(5):608-10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820511.
5
Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch.低位前切除术后经腹吻合术:一项比较端侧吻合术与结肠J袋长期结果的前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Nov;48(11):2100-8; discussion 2108-10. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0139-0.
6
Functional outcome after coloanal anastomosis with J-colonic pouch for rectal cancer.直肠癌行J形结肠袋结肠肛管吻合术后的功能结局
Ann Ital Chir. 1998 Jul-Aug;69(4):485-9.
7
Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: randomized controlled trial.结肠J袋在六个月时的功能与两年时的直结肠肛管吻合术:随机对照试验。
World J Surg. 2001 Jul;25(7):876-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0044-1.
8
Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.多媒体文章。腹腔镜超低位前切除术联合结肠J形贮袋肛管吻合术。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov;51(11):1710-1. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9322-4. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
9
Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch. Prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size.使用结肠J型贮袋行直肠癌低位前切除低位吻合术后的功能结局。确定最佳贮袋大小的前瞻性随机研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Sep;39(9):986-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02054686.
10
H-pouch: new isoperistaltic colonic pouch for coloanal anastomosis after rectal resection for cancer: a pilot study.H袋:直肠癌切除术后结肠肛管吻合术的新型等蠕动结肠袋:一项试点研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Oct;47(10):1740-4. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0632-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the colonic J-pouch versus straight (end-to-end) anastomosis following low anterior resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较低位前切除术后结肠 J 袋与直接(端对端)吻合:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Apr;37(4):919-938. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04130-w. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
2
Changes in surgical therapies for rectal cancer over the past 100 years: A review.过去100年直肠癌手术治疗的变化:综述
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 May 10;4(4):331-342. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12342. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Rectal cancer: a review.
直肠癌:综述
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Jan 31;29:171. eCollection 2015.
4
Coloplasty Neorectum versus Straight Anastomosis in Low Rectal Cancers.低位直肠癌结肠成形术新直肠与直接吻合术的比较
ISRN Surg. 2014 Jan 30;2014:382371. doi: 10.1155/2014/382371. eCollection 2014.
5
Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations.低位前切除综合征(LARS):病因与后果及重建相关问题。
Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Apr;17(2):151-62. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0909-3. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
6
Better functional outcome provided by short-armed sigmoid colon-rectal side-to-end anastomosis after laparoscopic low anterior resection: a match-paired retrospective study from China.腹腔镜低位前切除术后短臂乙状结肠直肠侧侧吻合术提供更好的功能结果:来自中国的匹配回顾性研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;27(4):535-41. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1359-5. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
7
Sphincter preservation for distal rectal cancer--a goal worth achieving at all costs?保肛治疗低位直肠癌——不惜一切代价都要实现的目标?
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb 21;17(7):855-61. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.855.
8
Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery equal to open surgery? An evidence based perspective.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术是否等同于开腹手术?基于循证的观点。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Apr 27;2(4):101-8. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i4.101.
9
Resection of rectal cancer: a historical review.直肠癌切除术:历史回顾。
Surg Today. 2010 Jun;40(6):501-6. doi: 10.1007/s00595-009-4153-z. Epub 2010 May 23.
10
Pouch operation for rectal cancer.直肠肿瘤的袋形手术。
Surg Today. 2010 Apr;40(4):307-14. doi: 10.1007/s00595-009-4046-1. Epub 2010 Mar 26.