Dowswell G, Lawler J, Young J, Forster A, Hearn J
Department of Applied Social Studies, University of Bradford, UK.
Clin Rehabil. 1997 Nov;11(4):293-301. doi: 10.1177/026921559701100405.
The involvement of five specialist nurses in providing a stroke support service was evaluated quantitatively in a recent randomized controlled trial. This complementary study used qualitative methods to evaluate trial outcomes more comprehensively.
To identify whether the nurses' intervention may have influenced the process of stroke recovery.
A purposefully selected subsample of 30 patients and 15 care-givers were interviewed within 1-3 months of their final quantitative assessment (12 months after recruitment to the randomized trial). Fifteen of the patients and eight of the care-givers had received visits from a specialist nurse. A semistructured interview was designed to include questions on perceptions of the recovery process and evaluation of services received.
Some differences were evident between the accounts of control and intervention group subjects. The less tangible aspects of nurses' interventions--concern, attention, empathy and interest, when combined with sound professional knowledge, had identifiable value to the patients and care-givers. It appeared that the nurses had employed considerable sensitivity and skill in identifying and responding to particular needs at appropriate times.
The qualitative evaluation offers a different picture to the quantitative results of the randomized controlled trial. In general, the findings of the qualitative study are more positive and encouraging than the quantitative results. The majority of patients and care-givers in the intervention group believed that they had benefited from the specialist nurse's visits.
在最近一项随机对照试验中,对五名专科护士参与提供中风支持服务进行了定量评估。这项补充研究采用定性方法更全面地评估试验结果。
确定护士的干预是否可能影响中风恢复过程。
在最终定量评估(随机试验招募后12个月)后的1至3个月内,对特意挑选的30名患者和15名护理人员进行了访谈。其中15名患者和8名护理人员接受了专科护士的探访。设计了半结构化访谈,包括关于对恢复过程的看法和对所接受服务的评价的问题。
对照组和干预组受试者的叙述之间存在一些明显差异。护士干预中较无形的方面——关心、关注、同理心和兴趣,与扎实的专业知识相结合,对患者和护理人员具有明显价值。护士似乎在适当的时候运用了相当的敏感度和技巧来识别并回应特定需求。
定性评估呈现出与随机对照试验定量结果不同的情况。总体而言,定性研究的结果比定量结果更积极且令人鼓舞。干预组中的大多数患者和护理人员认为他们从专科护士的探访中受益。