Cramer S C, Nelles G, Benson R R, Kaplan J D, Parker R A, Kwong K K, Kennedy D N, Finklestein S P, Rosen B R
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass., USA.
Stroke. 1997 Dec;28(12):2518-27. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2518.
Stroke recovery mechanisms remain incompletely understood, particularly for subjects with cortical stroke, in whom limited data are available. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to compare brain activations in normal controls and subjects who recovered from hemiparetic stroke.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed in ten stroke subjects with good recovery, five with deep, and five with cortical infarcts. Brain activation was achieved by index finger-tapping. Statistical parametric activation maps were obtained using a t test and a threshold of P < .001. In five bilateral motor regions, the volume of activated brain for each stroke subject was compared with the distribution of activation volumes among nine controls.
Control subjects activated several motor regions. During recovered hand finger-tapping, stroke subjects activated the same regions as controls, often in a larger brain volume. In the unaffected hemisphere, sensorimotor cortex activation was increased in six of nine stroke subjects compared with controls. Cerebellar hemisphere contralateral and premotor cortex ipsilateral to this region, as well as supplementary motor areas, also had increased activation. In the stroke hemisphere, activation exceeding controls was uncommon, except that three of five cortical strokes showed peri-infarct activation foci. During unaffected hand finger-tapping, increased activation by stroke subjects compared with controls was uncommon; however, decreased activation was seen in unaffected sensorimotor cortex, suggesting that this region's responsiveness increased to the ipsilateral hand and decreased to contralateral hand movements. Use of a different threshold for defining activation (P < .01) did not change the overall findings (kappa = .75).
Recovered finger-tapping by stroke subjects activated the same motor regions as controls but to a larger extent, particularly in the unaffected hemisphere. Increased reliance on these motor areas may represent an important component of motor recovery. Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of subjects who recovered from stroke provide evidence for several processes that may be related to restoration of neurologic function.
中风恢复机制仍未完全明确,尤其是对于皮质中风患者,相关数据有限。我们利用功能磁共振成像比较正常对照者与从偏瘫性中风恢复的患者的脑激活情况。
对10例恢复良好的中风患者、5例深部梗死患者和5例皮质梗死患者进行功能磁共振成像检查。通过食指敲击实现脑激活。使用t检验和P <.001的阈值获得统计参数激活图。在五个双侧运动区域,将每位中风患者的激活脑体积与九名对照者的激活体积分布进行比较。
对照者激活了多个运动区域。在恢复的手部手指敲击过程中,中风患者激活的区域与对照者相同,且激活的脑体积通常更大。在未受影响的半球,与对照者相比,9例中风患者中有6例的感觉运动皮层激活增加。该区域对侧的小脑半球和同侧的运动前皮层以及辅助运动区也有激活增加。在中风半球,激活超过对照者的情况并不常见,不过5例皮质中风中有3例显示梗死灶周围有激活灶。在未受影响的手部手指敲击过程中,中风患者与对照者相比激活增加的情况并不常见;然而,在未受影响的感觉运动皮层中观察到激活减少,这表明该区域对同侧手部运动的反应性增加,而对侧手部运动的反应性降低。使用不同的阈值定义激活(P <.01)并没有改变总体结果(kappa =.75)。
中风患者恢复的手指敲击激活的运动区域与对照者相同,但程度更大,尤其是在未受影响的半球。对这些运动区域的更多依赖可能是运动恢复的一个重要组成部分。对从中风恢复的患者进行的功能磁共振成像研究为可能与神经功能恢复相关的几个过程提供了证据。