Prasad N, Wright A, Hogg K J, Dunn F G
Department of Cardiology, Stobhill Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Heart. 1997 Nov;78(5):462-4. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.5.462.
Direct access to the coronary care unit (CCU) for general practitioner (GP) referred cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (fast track admission) substantially reduces the time to thrombolysis. Until now, this policy has been confined to GP referrals.
To determine the time taken to admission to CCU under the fast track policy (ambulance referrals and GP referrals) and the time taken to start administration of thrombolytics (ambulance referrals, GP referrals, and accident and emergency referrals).
Fast track admission policy was extended to include referrals from ambulance personnel who respond to emergency service calls. Ambulance personnel referred cases were also examined to see if they were referred appropriately to the CCU.
100 ambulance personnel referrals and 260 GP referrals to CCU with chest pain were studied. Forty accident and emergency referrals who had AMI requiring thrombolysis were also studied. In the ambulance referred group the time to admission from phone call was a median of 10 minutes (range 2 to 45), a saving of 30 minutes compared with GP referrals (median 40 minutes, range 2 to 217). The median diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) to thrombolysis time was longer in the accident and emergency referrals with AMI than either ambulance referrals or GP referrals admitted under the fast track policy. Diagnostic ECG to thrombolysis time: accident and emergency 50 minutes (range 15 to 385); ambulance referrals median 33 minutes (range 6 to 69); GP referrals median 29.5 minutes (range 5 to 110 minutes); (p = 0.056 accident and emergency compared with ambulance referrals, p < 0.002 accident and emergency compared with GP referrals). Of 100 ambulance referrals 52 patients exhibited symptoms suggestive of ischaemic heart disease (confirmed AMI, unstable angina, and angina) and a further 18 patients were required to stay in CCU for other cardiac problems. Thus a total of 70 (70%) were considered appropriate compared with 155 of 260 (55.8%) GP referred cases.
Extending the fast track admission policy to ambulance personnel reduces delay to admission for patients with suspected MI without adversely affecting the appropriateness of admissions.
对于全科医生(GP)转诊的疑似急性心肌梗死(AMI)病例,直接进入冠心病监护病房(CCU)(快速通道入院)可大幅缩短溶栓时间。到目前为止,这一政策仅限于GP转诊。
确定在快速通道政策下(救护车转诊和GP转诊)进入CCU的时间以及开始溶栓的时间(救护车转诊、GP转诊和急诊转诊)。
快速通道入院政策扩大到包括对紧急服务呼叫做出响应的救护人员的转诊。还对救护人员转诊的病例进行了检查,以确定他们是否被适当地转诊到CCU。
研究了100例由救护人员转诊至CCU且伴有胸痛的病例以及260例由GP转诊的病例。还研究了40例因AMI需要溶栓的急诊转诊病例。在救护人员转诊组中,从接到电话到入院的时间中位数为10分钟(范围为2至45分钟),与GP转诊相比节省了30分钟(中位数40分钟,范围为2至217分钟)。在AMI的急诊转诊病例中,从诊断性心电图(ECG)到溶栓的时间中位数比在快速通道政策下入院的救护人员转诊病例或GP转诊病例都要长。诊断性ECG到溶栓的时间:急诊为50分钟(范围为15至385分钟);救护人员转诊中位数为33分钟(范围为6至69分钟);GP转诊中位数为29.5分钟(范围为5至110分钟);(急诊与救护人员转诊相比p = 0.056,急诊与GP转诊相比p < 0.002)。在100例救护人员转诊病例中,52例患者表现出提示缺血性心脏病的症状(确诊AMI、不稳定型心绞痛和心绞痛),另有18例患者因其他心脏问题需要留在CCU。因此,共有70例(70%)被认为转诊适当,而在260例由GP转诊的病例中,这一比例为155例(55.8%)。
将快速通道入院政策扩大到救护人员可减少疑似心肌梗死患者的入院延迟,且不会对入院的适当性产生不利影响。