• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理人员对心肌梗死的快速处理

Fast-tracking of myocardial infarction by paramedics.

作者信息

Banerjee S, Rhoden W E

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Barnsley District General Hospital.

出版信息

J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1998 Jan-Feb;32(1):36-8.

PMID:9507439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9662960/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the effectiveness of a fast-track method of admitting patients with myocardial infarction directly to the coronary care unit (CCU).

STUDY DESIGN

Ambulance paramedic staff were trained and provided with a Life Pak XI Monitor/Defibrillator which can obtain a 12-lead electrocardiogram. When a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was made by the paramedics, the CCU was informed and the patient was directly transferred to the CCU, bypassing the accident and emergency (A&E) department. The appropriateness of admission to the CCU was assessed against set criteria. The time from call for help to the administration of thrombolytic therapy (thrombolysis time) in patients directly admitted to the CCU was compared with that in another group of patients with definite myocardial infarction who were admitted through the A&E department over the same period of time.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were fast-tracked to the CCU. Diagnosis of myocardial infarction was confirmed on admission in 14. Thirteen were treated with thrombolysis as there were no contra-indications; of the other 11 patients, seven were diagnosed as angina, one had complete heart block, one had haemodynamically significant atrial fibrillation and two had non-cardiac chest pain. The average time from call for help to thrombolysis in this group was 82 +/- 32 minutes. This was significantly shorter (p < 0.02) than in the patients who were admitted through A&E, in whom the average time from call for help to thrombolysis was 112 +/- 35 minutes. Twenty-one of 25 fast-tracked patients fulfilled the criteria for CCU admission.

CONCLUSION

The majority of fast-trackings are appropriate and will result in quicker administration of thrombolysis in hospitals where the facility for thrombolysis does not exist in the A&E department.

摘要

目的

研究一种将心肌梗死患者直接收入冠心病监护病房(CCU)的快速通道方法的有效性。

研究设计

对救护车医护人员进行培训,并为其配备可获取12导联心电图的Life Pak XI监测/除颤器。当医护人员确诊急性心肌梗死时,通知CCU并将患者直接转至CCU,绕过事故及急救(A&E)部门。根据既定标准评估收入CCU的适宜性。将直接收入CCU的患者从呼救到进行溶栓治疗的时间(溶栓时间)与同期通过A&E部门收入的另一组确诊心肌梗死患者的溶栓时间进行比较。

结果

25例患者通过快速通道进入CCU。14例入院时心肌梗死诊断得到证实。13例因无禁忌证接受了溶栓治疗;另外11例患者中,7例诊断为心绞痛,1例有完全性心脏传导阻滞,1例有血流动力学意义的心房颤动,2例有非心源性胸痛。该组从呼救到溶栓的平均时间为82±32分钟。这明显短于(p<0.02)通过A&E部门入院的患者,后者从呼救到溶栓的平均时间为112±35分钟。25例通过快速通道入院的患者中有21例符合CCU入院标准。

结论

大多数快速通道入院是合适的,对于A&E部门没有溶栓设施的医院,这将使溶栓治疗更快实施。

相似文献

1
Fast-tracking of myocardial infarction by paramedics.护理人员对心肌梗死的快速处理
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1998 Jan-Feb;32(1):36-8.
2
Direct admission to the coronary care unit by the ambulance service for patients with suspected myocardial infarction.疑似心肌梗死患者由救护车直接送往冠心病监护病房。
Heart. 1997 Nov;78(5):462-4. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.5.462.
3
Reduction in treatment delay by paramedic ECG diagnosis of myocardial infarction with direct CCU admission.通过护理人员对心肌梗死进行心电图诊断并直接送入冠心病监护病房来减少治疗延迟。
Heart. 1997 Nov;78(5):456-61. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.5.456.
4
Collaborative decision-making between paramedics and CCU nurses based on 12-lead ECG telemetry expedites the delivery of thrombolysis in ST elevation myocardial infarction.基于12导联心电图遥测技术,护理人员与冠心病监护病房护士之间的协作决策可加快ST段抬高型心肌梗死溶栓治疗的实施。
Emerg Med J. 2008 Jun;25(6):370-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.052746.
5
Lower mortality after prehospital recognition and treatment followed by fast tracking to coronary care compared with admittance via emergency department in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.与经急诊入院相比,对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行院前识别和治疗,然后快速转入冠心病监护病房可降低死亡率。
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Oct 13;129(3):325-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
6
Thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: the safety and efficiency of treatment in the accident and emergency department.急性心肌梗死的溶栓治疗:急诊科治疗的安全性和有效性。
J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;16(5):325-30. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.5.325.
7
Effect of "fast track" admission for acute myocardial infarction on delay to thrombolysis.急性心肌梗死“快速通道”入院对溶栓延迟的影响。
BMJ. 1992 Jan 11;304(6819):83-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6819.83.
8
Safety and efficacy of nurse initiated thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction.护士启动的溶栓治疗在急性心肌梗死患者中的安全性和有效性。
BMJ. 2002 Jun 1;324(7349):1328-31. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7349.1328.
9
The possibility of influencing components of hospital delay time within emergency departments among patients with ST-elevation in the initial electrocardiogram.对于初始心电图显示ST段抬高的患者,影响急诊科内医院延误时间组成部分的可能性。
Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Sep;5(3):289-96.
10
"Point of entry" treatment gives best time to thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.“入院时”治疗为急性心肌梗死溶栓提供最佳时机。
Aust Health Rev. 2001;24(1):157-60. doi: 10.1071/ah010157.

引用本文的文献

1
Does initiation of an ambulance pre-alert call reduce the door to needle time in acute myocardial infarct?启动救护车预报警电话是否能缩短急性心肌梗死患者的门针时间?
Emerg Med J. 2006 Jan;23(1):79-81. doi: 10.1136/emj.2004.022376.
2
Potential impact of interventions to reduce times to thrombolysis.减少溶栓时间干预措施的潜在影响。
Emerg Med J. 2004 Sep;21(5):625-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.012575.
3
Call to needle times after acute myocardial infarction in urban and rural areas in northeast Scotland: prospective observational study.苏格兰东北部城乡地区急性心肌梗死后的呼叫至针刺时间:前瞻性观察研究
BMJ. 1998 Aug 29;317(7158):576-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7158.576.