Mitchell J A
Am J Occup Ther. 1976 Jul;30(6):362-9.
The constructional praxis ability of 69 normal 5 and 6 year olds was studied to validate established norms, to gain normative data for the Gesell Block Test and the Benton and Fogel Test of Constructional Praxis, and to identify a developmental continuum. No significant difference was found between scores obtained by the two age groups; however, a difference significant at the less than .05 level was found between scores of five-year-old boys and girls. The results suggest that these tests measure a continuum of development and that with revisions they may be useful to provide additional information about development of constructional praxis ability in a larger sample of normal and brain-damaged children.
对69名5岁和6岁正常儿童的建构实践能力进行了研究，以验证既定规范，获取格塞尔积木测试、本顿和福格尔建构实践测试的常模数据，并确定发育连续性。两个年龄组获得的分数之间未发现显著差异；然而，五岁男孩和女孩的分数之间在小于0.05的水平上存在显著差异。结果表明，这些测试测量了一个发育连续体，并且经过修订后，它们可能有助于为更多正常和脑损伤儿童样本提供有关建构实践能力发展的更多信息。
