Leung D Y, Dawson I G, Thomas J D, Marwick T H
Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195, USA.
Am Heart J. 1997 Dec;134(6):1052-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(97)70025-5.
Mitral valve prolapse is sometimes associated with chest pain, but this symptom may also be caused by coexisting coronary disease. The accuracy of exercise echocardiography in diagnosing coronary disease in these patients and the most cost-efficient diagnostic approach are unclear. We studied 96 patients (aged 59 +/- 12 years; 70 men) with mitral valve prolapse who underwent exercise electrocardiography, exercise echocardiography, and coronary angiography. The accuracies of seven diagnostic strategies based on the current and expected use of exercise electrocardiography and exercise echocardiography in patients with mitral valve prolapse were examined, with the costs calculated based on Medicare reimbursement. Thirteen (13.5%) patients had significant coronary artery disease. The sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography in the 71 patients with interpretable electrocardiograms were 50% and 72%, respectively. For the 73 patients who achieved >85% of maximal heart rate, 52 had interpretable exercise electrocardiograms (sensitivity 50%; specificity 69%). Exercise echocardiography had a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 98% in the 96 patients and a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 96% in patients who achieved >85% of maximal heart rate. Approaches adopting Bayes' theorem and restricting further investigation to patients with at least intermediate pretest probability of coronary disease were the least costly. When combined with exercise echocardiography as the initial test, clinical stratification was associated with a false-negative rate of 21%. The utility of exercise electrocardiography is limited by the high prevalence of resting electrocardiographic abnormalities and suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. The best balance of cost and diagnostic accuracy is to perform exercise echocardiography in patients with at least intermediate probability of coronary artery disease.
二尖瓣脱垂有时与胸痛相关,但该症状也可能由并存的冠心病引起。运动超声心动图在诊断这些患者冠心病方面的准确性以及最具成本效益的诊断方法尚不清楚。我们研究了96例(年龄59±12岁;70例男性)二尖瓣脱垂患者,这些患者接受了运动心电图、运动超声心动图和冠状动脉造影检查。基于运动心电图和运动超声心动图在二尖瓣脱垂患者中的当前及预期应用,对7种诊断策略的准确性进行了检查,并根据医疗保险报销情况计算了成本。13例(13.5%)患者有严重冠状动脉疾病。在71例心电图可解读的患者中,运动心电图的敏感性和特异性分别为50%和72%。在73例达到最大心率>85%的患者中,52例有可解读的运动心电图(敏感性50%;特异性69%)。在96例患者中,运动超声心动图的敏感性为69%,特异性为98%;在达到最大心率>85%的患者中,敏感性为82%,特异性为96%。采用贝叶斯定理并将进一步检查限制在冠心病预测试验概率至少为中等的患者中的方法成本最低。当与运动超声心动图作为初始检查相结合时,临床分层的假阴性率为21%。运动心电图的效用受到静息心电图异常的高患病率以及敏感性和特异性欠佳的限制。成本与诊断准确性的最佳平衡是对冠状动脉疾病概率至少为中等的患者进行运动超声心动图检查。