Marwick T H, Anderson T, Williams M J, Haluska B, Melin J A, Pashkow F, Thomas J D
Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Aug;26(2):335-41. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)80004-z.
This study compared the accuracy and cost implications of using exercise echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease in women.
The specificity of exercise electrocardiography in women is lower than in men. Exercise echocardiography accurately identifies coronary artery disease in women, but its utility in place of exercise electrocardiography is unclear.
One hundred sixty-one women without a previous Q wave infarction underwent exercise echocardiography and coronary angiography. Positive findings were a new or worsening wall motion abnormality on the exercise echocardiogram and ST segment depression > 0.1 mV at 0.08 s after the J point on the exercise electrocardiogram (ECG).
Coronary artery stenosis > 50% diameter narrowing was present in 59 patients; the sensitivity (mean +/- SD) of exercise echocardiography was 80 +/- 3%. In 48 patients with an interpretable ECG, the sensitivity of exercise echocardiography was 81 +/- 4%, and that of the exercise ECG was 77 +/- 3% (p = 0.50). In 102 patients without coronary artery disease, the overall specificity of exercise echocardiography was 81 +/- 4%. In 70 patients with an interpretable ECG, the specificity of exercise echocardiography (80 +/- 3%) exceeded that of the exercise ECG (56 +/- 4%, p < 0.0004). The accuracy of exercise echocardiography was also greater than exercise electrocardiography (81 +/- 5% vs. 64 +/- 6%, p < 0.005). Exercise echocardiography stratified significantly more patients of intermediate (20% to 80%) pretest disease probability into the high (> 80%) or low (< 20%) posttest probability group. In women without a previous exercise ECG, the specificity of exercise echocardiography continued to exceed that of exercise electrocardiography (80 +/- 3% vs. 64 +/- 3%, p = 0.05). Exercise echocardiography had the best balance between accuracy and cost for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women.
Exercise echocardiography is more specific than exercise electrocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in women and is a cost-effective approach to the diagnosis of coronary artery disease because of the avoidance of inappropriate angiography.
本研究比较了运动超声心动图和运动心电图检测女性冠状动脉疾病的准确性及成本影响。
运动心电图在女性中的特异性低于男性。运动超声心动图能准确识别女性冠状动脉疾病,但其替代运动心电图的效用尚不清楚。
161名既往无Q波梗死的女性接受了运动超声心动图和冠状动脉造影检查。阳性结果为运动超声心动图上新发或加重的室壁运动异常,以及运动心电图(ECG)上J点后0.08秒ST段压低>0.1 mV。
59例患者存在冠状动脉狭窄,直径狭窄>50%;运动超声心动图的敏感性(均值±标准差)为80±3%。在48例可解读心电图的患者中,运动超声心动图的敏感性为81±4%,运动心电图的敏感性为77±3%(p = 0.50)。在102例无冠状动脉疾病的患者中,运动超声心动图的总体特异性为81±4%。在70例可解读心电图的患者中,运动超声心动图的特异性(80±3%)超过运动心电图(56±4%,p < 0.0004)。运动超声心动图的准确性也高于运动心电图(81±5%对64±6%,p < 0.005)。运动超声心动图将更多预测试验疾病概率为中等(20%至80%)的患者显著分层到高(>80%)或低(<20%)的测试后概率组。在既往未进行运动心电图检查的女性中,运动超声心动图的特异性继续超过运动心电图(80±3%对64±3%,p = 0.05)。运动超声心动图在女性冠状动脉疾病诊断的准确性和成本之间具有最佳平衡。
运动超声心动图在诊断女性冠状动脉疾病方面比运动心电图更具特异性,并且由于避免了不适当的血管造影,是一种具有成本效益的冠状动脉疾病诊断方法。