Shinohara A, Gasior S, Ogawa T, Kleckner N, Bishop D K
Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan.
Genes Cells. 1997 Oct;2(10):615-29. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1997.1480347.x.
Rad51 and Dmc1 are Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologues of the Escherichia coli recombination protein RecA. Mutant analysis has shown that both proteins are required for normal meiotic recombination, for timely and efficient formation of synaptonemal complex and for normal progression out from meiotic prophase.
We have further characterized rad51 and dmc1 single mutants. A dmc1 mutation confers more severe defects in double strand break (DSB) resolution, crossover recombination and meiotic progression than does a rad51 mutant; in contrast, during return to growth, a rad51 mutation confers more severe defects in viability and intrachromosomal recombination than does a dmc1 mutation. Analysis of a rad51 dmc1 double mutant, in parallel with single mutants, shows that the double mutant is more defective with respect to the formation of crossovers during meiosis and, especially strikingly, with respect to interhomologue and intrachromosomal recombination during return to growth. Consistent with the observation of DMC1-dependent recombination in a rad51 mutant, subnuclear complexes of Dmc1 protein were detected for the first time in this mutant. In contrast to the effects on recombination, the effect of the double mutant on meiotic progression was similar to that of the rad51 single mutant.
Rad51 and Dmc1 each make unique contributions to meiotic recombination. However, the two proteins are capable of substituting for one another under some circumstances, implying that they most likely share at least one recombination function. Recombination and cell cycle phenotypes are all consistent with the possibility that a dmc1 mutation causes an arrest of the post-DSB recombination complexes at a later, more stable stage than does a rad51 mutation.
Rad51和Dmc1是大肠杆菌重组蛋白RecA在酿酒酵母中的同源物。突变分析表明,这两种蛋白对于正常的减数分裂重组、联会复合体的及时有效形成以及从减数分裂前期正常进展都是必需的。
我们进一步对rad51和dmc1单突变体进行了表征。与rad51突变体相比,dmc1突变在双链断裂(DSB)修复、交叉重组和减数分裂进程中导致更严重的缺陷;相反,在恢复生长过程中,rad51突变在活力和染色体内重组方面比dmc1突变导致更严重的缺陷。与单突变体平行分析rad51 dmc1双突变体表明,双突变体在减数分裂期间交叉形成方面,尤其是在恢复生长期间同源染色体间和染色体内重组方面,缺陷更为严重。与在rad51突变体中观察到的依赖DMC1的重组一致,首次在该突变体中检测到Dmc1蛋白的亚核复合体。与对重组的影响相反,双突变体对减数分裂进程的影响与rad51单突变体相似。
Rad51和Dmc1在减数分裂重组中各自发挥独特作用。然而,这两种蛋白在某些情况下能够相互替代,这意味着它们很可能至少共享一种重组功能。重组和细胞周期表型均与以下可能性一致:与rad51突变相比,dmc1突变导致DSB后重组复合体在更晚、更稳定的阶段停滞。