• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部眼部抗过敏药物对人结膜肥大细胞的比较作用。

Comparative effects of topical ocular anti-allergy drugs on human conjunctival mast cells.

作者信息

Yanni J M, Miller S T, Gamache D A, Spellman J M, Xu S, Sharif N A

机构信息

Ophthalmic Products Research, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Dec;79(6):541-5. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63063-3.

DOI:10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63063-3
PMID:9433371
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The concept of mast cell heterogeneity is well established. Recent data indicate that human conjunctival tissue mast cells and human connective tissue mast cells respond to various secretagogues in similar fashion. It is now recognized that different mast cell populations respond differently to anti-allergic drugs.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study is to compare the effects of three new ocular anti-allergic drugs (nedocromil, olopatadine, and pemirolast) on mediator release from the target human conjunctival mast cell population with those of cromolyn sodium. The affinity of the compounds for the histamine H1 receptor was also compared.

METHODS

A monodispersed suspension of partially purified human conjunctival mast cells was prepared from cadaver conjunctival tissue. Mast cells (5 x 10(3)) were challenged with anti-human IgE in the presence or absence of test drugs, and histamine content of the cell supernatants was determined using a specific radioimmunoassay. H1 receptor binding activity was assessed using a radioligand binding assay.

RESULTS

Cromolyn and pemirolast (100 nM to 1 mM) failed to significantly inhibit histamine release from human conjunctival mast cells using exposure times of 1 and 15 minutes prior to challenge. Using identical nedocromil concentrations and exposure times, statistically significant (P < .05) inhibition (28%) of histamine release was observed at only the 100 microM concentration and 1-minute exposure time. In contrast, olopatadine inhibited histamine release in a concentration-dependent fashion (r = 0.891, n = 59, IC50 = 653 microM). Only olopatadine exhibited significant H1 receptor binding activity at relevant concentrations (Ki = 36 nM, n = 13).

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that olopatadine possesses anti-allergic activity in the appropriate targets for topical ocular anti-allergic drug therapy, human conjunctival mast cells. Coupled with the compound's antihistaminic activity, this suggests that olopatadine will have efficacy advantages in allergic conjunctivitis patients over the other drugs tested.

摘要

背景

肥大细胞异质性的概念已得到充分确立。近期数据表明,人类结膜组织肥大细胞和人类结缔组织肥大细胞对各种促分泌素的反应方式相似。现在人们认识到,不同的肥大细胞群体对抗过敏药物的反应不同。

目的

本研究的目的是比较三种新型眼部抗过敏药物(奈多罗米、奥洛他定和吡嘧司特)与色甘酸钠对目标人类结膜肥大细胞群体介质释放的影响。还比较了这些化合物对组胺H1受体的亲和力。

方法

从尸体结膜组织制备部分纯化的人类结膜肥大细胞单分散悬液。肥大细胞(5×10³)在有或无受试药物的情况下用抗人IgE刺激,使用特异性放射免疫测定法测定细胞上清液中的组胺含量。使用放射性配体结合测定法评估H1受体结合活性。

结果

色甘酸钠和吡嘧司特(100 nM至1 mM)在刺激前1分钟和15分钟的暴露时间内,未能显著抑制人类结膜肥大细胞释放组胺。使用相同的奈多罗米浓度和暴露时间,仅在100 microM浓度和1分钟暴露时间时观察到组胺释放有统计学意义(P <.05)的抑制(28%)。相比之下,奥洛他定以浓度依赖方式抑制组胺释放(r = 0.891,n = 59,IC50 = 653 microM)。只有奥洛他定在相关浓度下表现出显著的H1受体结合活性(Ki = 36 nM,n = 13)。

结论

这些数据表明,奥洛他定在局部眼部抗过敏药物治疗的合适靶点即人类结膜肥大细胞中具有抗过敏活性。结合该化合物的抗组胺活性,这表明奥洛他定在过敏性结膜炎患者中比其他受试药物具有疗效优势。

相似文献

1
Comparative effects of topical ocular anti-allergy drugs on human conjunctival mast cells.局部眼部抗过敏药物对人结膜肥大细胞的比较作用。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Dec;79(6):541-5. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63063-3.
2
Characterization of the ocular antiallergic and antihistaminic effects of olopatadine (AL-4943A), a novel drug for treating ocular allergic diseases.奥洛他定(AL-4943A)是一种治疗眼部过敏性疾病的新型药物,对其眼部抗过敏和抗组胺作用的表征。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996 Sep;278(3):1252-61.
3
The in vitro and in vivo ocular pharmacology of olopatadine (AL-4943A), an effective anti-allergic/antihistaminic agent.奥洛他定(AL-4943A),一种有效的抗过敏/抗组胺药物的体外和体内眼部药理学。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Winter;12(4):389-400. doi: 10.1089/jop.1996.12.389.
4
Ocular anti-allergic compounds selectively inhibit human mast cell cytokines in vitro and conjunctival cell infiltration in vivo.眼部抗过敏化合物在体外可选择性抑制人肥大细胞细胞因子,在体内可抑制结膜细胞浸润。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 Nov;37(11):1648-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02782.x. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
5
Olopatadine inhibits TNFalpha release from human conjunctival mast cells.奥洛他定抑制人结膜肥大细胞释放肿瘤坏死因子α。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2000 May;84(5):504-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62513-6.
6
Olopatadine inhibits anti-immunoglobulin E-stimulated conjunctival mast cell upregulation of ICAM-1 expression on conjunctival epithelial cells.奥洛他定可抑制抗免疫球蛋白E刺激的结膜肥大细胞对结膜上皮细胞细胞间黏附分子-1表达的上调作用。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Nov;87(5):424-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62926-2.
7
Olopatadine: a drug for allergic conjunctivitis targeting the mast cell.奥洛他定:一种针对肥大细胞的过敏性结膜炎药物。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Apr;11(6):969-81. doi: 10.1517/14656561003694643.
8
Interactions of olopatadine and selected antihistamines with model and natural membranes.奥洛他定及选定抗组胺药与模型膜和天然膜的相互作用。
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2003 Dec;11(4):247-68. doi: 10.1076/ocii.11.4.247.18261.
9
Mast cell stabilization and anti-histamine effects of olopatadine ophthalmic solution: a review of pre-clinical and clinical research.奥洛他定滴眼液的肥大细胞稳定作用和抗组胺作用:临床前和临床研究综述
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Sep;21(9):1377-87. doi: 10.1185/030079905X56547.
10
A current appreciation of sites for pharmacological intervention in allergic conjunctivitis: effects of new topical ocular drugs.变应性结膜炎药物干预部位的最新认识:新型局部眼用药物的作用
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl. 1999(228):33-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1999.tb01171.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Discovery to Launch of Anti-allergy (Emadine; Patanol/Pataday/Pazeo) and Anti-glaucoma (Travatan; Simbrinza) Ocular Drugs, and Generation of Novel Pharmacological Tools Such as AL-8810.抗过敏(依美斯汀;帕坦洛/帕迪特/帕泽奥)和抗青光眼(曲伏前列素;辛布林扎)眼科药物的研发至上市,以及新型药理学工具如AL - 8810的产生。
ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2020 Nov 5;3(6):1391-1421. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.0c00137. eCollection 2020 Dec 11.
2
Histamine-mediated autocrine signaling in mesenteric perilymphatic mast cells.肠系膜淋巴管周围肥大细胞中的组胺介导的自分泌信号转导。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2020 Mar 1;318(3):R590-R604. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00255.2019. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Projected 24-hour post-dose ocular itching scores post-treatment with olopatadine 0.7% versus 0.2.
治疗后 0.7%奥洛他定与 0.2%奥洛他定 24 小时后预测眼部瘙痒评分。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2018 Aug;45(4):593-605. doi: 10.1007/s10928-018-9588-7. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
4
Age-related Defects in Ocular and Nasal Mucosal Immune System and the Immunopathology of Dry Eye Disease.眼和鼻黏膜免疫系统的年龄相关缺陷与干眼病的免疫病理学
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2016 Jun;24(3):327-47. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2014.986581. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
5
Olopatadine ophthalmic solution suppresses substance P release in the conjunctivitis models.奥洛他定滴眼液在结膜炎模型中可抑制P物质的释放。
Asia Pac Allergy. 2012 Apr;2(2):115-21. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2012.2.2.115. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
6
Olopatadine hydrochloride and rupatadine fumarate in seasonal allergic rhinitis: A comparative study of efficacy and safety.盐酸奥洛他定和富马酸卢帕他定治疗季节性变应性鼻炎:疗效与安全性的比较研究
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2011 Oct;2(4):270-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.85958.
7
Antihistamines in ocular allergy: are they all created equal?抗组胺药在眼部过敏中的应用:它们都一样吗?
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2011 Jun;11(3):205-11. doi: 10.1007/s11882-011-0188-5.
8
Treatment of allergic conjunctivitis with olopatadine hydrochloride eye drops.用盐酸奥洛他定滴眼液治疗过敏性结膜炎。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;2(3):525-31. doi: 10.2147/opth.s3294.
9
Comparative study of topical anti-allergic eye drops on human conjunctiva-derived cells: responses to histamine and IFN gamma and toxicological profiles.局部用抗过敏眼药水对人结膜来源细胞的比较研究:对组胺和γ干扰素的反应及毒理学特征
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;245(4):534-46. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0353-z. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
10
Ocular allergy in pediatric practice.儿科临床中的眼部过敏
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2006 Jul;6(4):306-11. doi: 10.1007/s11882-006-0064-x.