Suppr超能文献

修订医学课程的课程中评估试点研究:I. 纸质形式,全班参与。

Pilot studies of in-course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: I. Paper-based, whole class.

作者信息

Schwartz P L, Loten E G, Miller A P

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1997 Dec;72(12):1109-12. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199712000-00025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To test a paper-based method of in-course assessment for a modular, systems-oriented medical curriculum at the University of Otago Medical School.

METHOD

In 1996, 193 students took paper-based quizzes on the first four topics of a course in clinical biochemistry. A score of 75% was required for passing, but students could retake quizzes. The subsequent test on these four topics was constructed from questions used in previous years. The next four topics were taught without quizzes. The test on these topics was again constructed from questions used in past years. The authors examined the performances on the quizzes and tests and sought the students' opinions about the program.

RESULTS

72.0-95.3% of the students passed the quizzes the first time and 94.8-99.5% passed by the second version. Performance on the subsequent test items was higher than [corrected] when the items had been used previously; so was performance on three of the four questions for the next four topics, none of which had been accompanied by quizzes. Students valued the quizzes as a stimulus to study and as feedback. They preferred the segment of the course with the quizzes to the segment without them.

CONCLUSION

This method of in-course assessment was easy to administer and highly acceptable to the students. Performance on the quizzes was more than satisfactory and a passing score of 75% was reasonable. Such quizzes appeared to be able to replace a test that required explanation of answers while increasing the numbers of questions that could be asked and decreasing the marking time.

摘要

目的

测试一种用于奥塔哥大学医学院模块化、以系统为导向的医学课程的基于纸质的课程评估方法。

方法

1996年,193名学生参加了关于临床生物化学课程前四个主题的纸质小测验。及格分数要求为75%,但学生可以重考。后续关于这四个主题的测试由往年使用的问题构成。接下来的四个主题教学时没有进行小测验。关于这些主题的测试同样由往年使用的问题构成。作者检查了小测验和测试的成绩,并征求了学生对该方案的意见。

结果

72.0%至95.3%的学生第一次通过了小测验,第二次测验时94.8%至99.5%的学生通过。后续测试项目的成绩高于[修正后]这些项目之前使用时的成绩;对于接下来四个主题的四个问题中的三个,成绩也是如此,而这四个主题都没有进行过小测验。学生们重视小测验,认为它是学习的动力和反馈。他们更喜欢课程中有小测验的部分,而不是没有小测验的部分。

结论

这种课程评估方法易于实施,学生接受度很高。小测验的成绩非常令人满意,75%的及格分数是合理的。这样的小测验似乎能够取代需要解释答案的测试,同时增加可提问的问题数量并减少评分时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验