Suppr超能文献

形成性实践测验与医学解剖课程总结性考试成绩之间的关联。

Associations between formative practice quizzes and summative examination outcomes in a medical anatomy course.

机构信息

Program in Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois; Ralph P. Leischner Jr., M.D. Institute for Medical Education, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois.

出版信息

Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb;8(1):37-44. doi: 10.1002/ase.1442. Epub 2014 Mar 4.

Abstract

Formative practice quizzes have become common resources for self-evaluation and focused reviews of course content in the medical curriculum. We conducted two separate studies to (1) compare the effects of a single or multiple voluntary practice quizzes on subsequent summative examinations and (2) examine when students are most likely to use practice quizzes relative to the summative examinations. In the first study, providing a single on-line practice quiz followed by instructor feedback had no effect on examination average grades compared to the previous year or student performances on similar questions. However, there were significant correlations between student performance on each practice quiz and each summative examination (r = 0.42 and r = 0.24). When students were provided multiple practice quizzes with feedback (second study), there were weak correlations between the frequency of use and performance on each summative examination (r = 0.17 and r = 0.07). The frequency with which students accessed the practice quizzes was greatest the day before each examination. In both studies, there was a decline in the level of student utilization of practice quizzes over time. We conclude that practice quizzes provide some predictive value for performances on summative examinations. Second, making practice quizzes available for longer periods prior to summative examinations does not promote the use of the quizzes as a study strategy because students appear to use them mostly to assess knowledge one to two days prior to examinations.

摘要

形成性实践测验已成为医学课程中自我评价和课程内容重点复习的常用资源。我们进行了两项独立的研究,(1)比较单次或多次自愿实践测验对后续总结性考试的影响,(2)考察学生何时最有可能相对于总结性考试使用实践测验。在第一项研究中,与前一年或学生在类似问题上的表现相比,提供单次在线实践测验并附有教师反馈对考试平均成绩没有影响。然而,每个实践测验和每个总结性考试的学生表现之间存在显著的相关性(r=0.42 和 r=0.24)。当学生提供带有反馈的多个实践测验(第二项研究)时,每次使用的频率与每次总结性考试的表现之间存在弱相关性(r=0.17 和 r=0.07)。学生访问实践测验的频率在每次考试前一天最高。在两项研究中,随着时间的推移,学生对实践测验的使用水平都有所下降。我们得出结论,实践测验对总结性考试的表现具有一定的预测价值。其次,在总结性考试之前提供更长时间的实践测验并不会促进学生将其作为一种学习策略,因为学生似乎主要在考试前一到两天使用它们来评估知识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验