Bailey R, Weingarten S, Lewis M, Mohsenifar Z
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Chest. 1998 Jan;113(1):28-33. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.1.28.
In 1990, it was estimated that approximately 1% of all US health-care costs (approximately $6.2 billion) were spent on asthma-related health expenses. Of this, hospitalization charges alone exceeded $2.6 billion. Practice guidelines and clinical pathways are being developed to standardize the management of acute asthma with the aim of improving care and safely reducing health-care costs. In this report, we evaluate the impact of an asthma pathway developed and instituted at a large community-based teaching hospital. This pathway was evidence based and was developed by a multidisciplinary group.
The study was conducted during a 6-month period in 1995, while a similar period in 1994 was used as a historical control period. Data collected included patient demographics, hospital admission and discharge peak expiratory flow rates, pulse oximetry measurements, length of stay, conversion from hand-held nebulizer to metered-dose inhaler, use of corticosteroids within 24 h of hospitalization, and conversion of i.v. steroids to oral steroids.
A total of 42 patients were enrolled during the study period. Of these, 19 were placed on the pathway, while 23 were not treated according to the pathway. There were 38 patients in the 1994 historical control period. For 1995, there was no significant difference between the pathway and nonpathway groups with regard to the length of stay (4.4+/-3.3 vs 3.2+/-2.3 days; p > 0.05), hospital discharge peak expiratory flow rates (324 vs 286 L/min; p > 0.05), or use of steroids (100% vs 91%; p > 0.05). However, a significant increase in conversion from hand-held nebulizer to metered-dose inhaler was noted in the pathway group (68% vs 34%; p < 0.05). The data from 1994 compared to 1995 pathway were similar in that there was no difference in the length of stay (3.4+/-2.1 vs 4.4+/-3.3 days; p > 0.05) and/or use of steroids (92% vs 100%; p > 0.05), while a significant increase in hand-held nebulizer to metered-dose inhaler conversion was observed for the 1995 pathway group (68% vs 26%; p=0.002).
We conclude that although the asthma pathway did not significantly reduce length of stay, it was associated with a significant increase in hand-held nebulizer to metered-dose inhaler conversion, resulting in a substantial cost savings of $288,000/year.
1990年据估计,美国所有医疗保健费用的约1%(约62亿美元)用于与哮喘相关的医疗支出。其中,仅住院费用就超过26亿美元。目前正在制定实践指南和临床路径,以规范急性哮喘的管理,目的是改善护理并安全降低医疗保健成本。在本报告中,我们评估了一家大型社区教学医院制定并实施的哮喘路径的影响。该路径基于证据,由一个多学科团队制定。
该研究于1995年的6个月期间进行,同时将1994年的类似时期用作历史对照期。收集的数据包括患者人口统计学信息、入院和出院时的呼气峰值流速、脉搏血氧饱和度测量值、住院时间、从手持式雾化器转换为定量吸入器的情况、住院24小时内使用皮质类固醇的情况以及静脉注射类固醇转换为口服类固醇的情况。
研究期间共纳入42例患者。其中,19例按照该路径进行治疗,而23例未按照该路径治疗。1994年历史对照期有38例患者。1995年,路径组和非路径组在住院时间(4.4±3.3天对3.2±2.3天;p>0.05)、出院时呼气峰值流速(324对286升/分钟;p>0.05)或类固醇使用情况(100%对91%;p>0.05)方面无显著差异。然而,路径组中从手持式雾化器转换为定量吸入器的比例显著增加(68%对34%;p<0.05)。1994年与1995年路径的数据相似,住院时间(3.4±2.1天对4.4±3.3天;p>0.05)和/或类固醇使用情况(92%对100%;p>0.05)无差异,而1995年路径组中从手持式雾化器转换为定量吸入器的比例显著增加(68%对26%;p=0.002)。
我们得出结论,尽管哮喘路径未显著缩短住院时间,但它与从手持式雾化器转换为定量吸入器的比例显著增加相关,每年可节省大量成本28.8万美元。