Matarazzo J D, Matarazzo R G, Wiens A N, Gallo A E, Klonoff H
J Clin Psychol. 1976 Apr;32(2):338-49. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197604)32:2<338::aid-jclp2270320230>3.0.co;2-o.
In a 1974 study Matarazzo, et al. reported the test-retest reliability of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery for a sample of normal young men and a comparison group of older Ss with cerebrovascular disease. The present study extended this earlier one by addition of comparable test-retest findings from two additional comparison groups: a sample of chronic schizophrenic Ss and a sample of organic patients who underwent endarterectomy. Despite the lack of comparability across the four samples on many dimensions, including age and test-retest interval, the results again reveal a high degree of clinical as well as purely psychometric reliability for most of the tests in the neuropsychological battery and the additional suggestion for further research that the test-retest instability found for some of the Ss in the schizophrenic sample may, itself, hold promise of differential clinical significance in the diagnosis of a "schizophrenic" vs. "organic" process.
在1974年的一项研究中，马塔拉佐等人报告了霍尔斯特德-赖坦神经心理成套测验对一组正常青年男性样本以及一组患有脑血管疾病的老年受试者对照组的重测信度。本研究扩展了这项早期研究，增加了另外两个对照组的类似重测结果：一组慢性精神分裂症患者样本和一组接受动脉内膜切除术的器质性疾病患者样本。尽管这四个样本在包括年龄和重测间隔等许多维度上缺乏可比性，但结果再次表明，神经心理成套测验中的大多数测试在临床以及纯心理测量方面都具有高度信度，并且进一步研究还发现，精神分裂症样本中的一些受试者出现的重测不稳定性本身可能在区分“精神分裂症”与“器质性”病程的诊断中具有不同的临床意义。
