Suppr超能文献

苯二氮䓬-GABAA受体复合物配体在两种焦虑模型中的研究

Benzodiazepine-GABAA receptor complex ligands in two models of anxiety.

作者信息

Nazar M, Jessa M, Płaźnik A

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Physiology of the Nervous System, Medical Academy, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

J Neural Transm (Vienna). 1997;104(6-7):733-46. doi: 10.1007/BF01291890.

Abstract

In the present study, the actions of several compounds with different intrinsic activities and BDZ receptor selectivity were examined in two well established animal models of anxiety: the open field test (OFT) and Vogel's punished drinking text (VT). Full agonists at the BDZ GABAA receptor (midazolam and diazepam) showed anxiolytic-like effects in both tests; however, the doses necessary to disinhibit animal behavior controlled by fear were higher in the VT than in the OFT. None of the partial BDZ receptor agonists studied (bretazenil, Ro 19-8022 and abecarnil) diminished neophobia-like behavior of rats in the OFT, and their sedative influence on gross behavior prevailed. On the other hand, all three drugs produced a clear-cut anxiolytic effect in the VT. A selective BDZ, receptor subtype full agonist (zolpidem) had a similar profile of action to that of partial agonists with an even stronger sedative effect in the OFT. Alpidem (a selective BDZ1 receptor partial agonist) did not reveal any anxiolytic action in either test. Flumazenil (an antagonist at the BDZ-GABAA receptors) also produced no effect in the OFT, or the VT. An inverse BDZ receptor agonist, beta-carboline-3-carboxylate methyl ester (beta-CCM), evoked an anxiogenic-like response in the OFT, but not in the VT. In summary, it appeared that partial agonists and selective ligands at BDZ1 receptors revealed less advantageous anxiolytic-like action than did full allosteric GABAA receptor modulators. This study also indicates the test dependent profiles of action of BDZ-GABAA receptor ligands. It also indirectly suggests a different neurobiological background underlying the applied tests.

摘要

在本研究中,我们在两种成熟的焦虑动物模型中检测了几种具有不同内在活性和苯二氮䓬(BDZ)受体选择性的化合物的作用:旷场试验(OFT)和Vogel饮水冲突试验(VT)。BDZ GABAA受体的完全激动剂(咪达唑仑和地西泮)在两种试验中均表现出抗焦虑样作用;然而,在VT中解除由恐惧控制的动物行为所需的剂量高于OFT。所研究的部分BDZ受体激动剂(布雷西坦、Ro 19-8022和阿贝卡尼)均未减少大鼠在OFT中的新物恐惧样行为,且它们对总体行为的镇静作用占主导。另一方面,这三种药物在VT中均产生了明显的抗焦虑作用。一种选择性BDZ受体亚型完全激动剂(唑吡坦)的作用模式与部分激动剂相似,在OFT中的镇静作用更强。阿皮西坦(一种选择性BDZ1受体部分激动剂)在两种试验中均未显示出任何抗焦虑作用。氟马西尼(BDZ-GABAA受体拮抗剂)在OFT或VT中也未产生任何作用。反向BDZ受体激动剂β-咔啉-3-羧酸甲酯(β-CCM)在OFT中引发了焦虑样反应,但在VT中未引发。总之,似乎BDZ1受体的部分激动剂和选择性配体显示出的抗焦虑样作用不如完全变构GABAA受体调节剂有利。本研究还表明了BDZ-GABAA受体配体的试验依赖性作用模式。它还间接表明了所应用试验背后不同的神经生物学背景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验