Suppr超能文献

[早期临床多发性创伤护理中的质量管理。治疗记录与重症护理质量评估]

[Quality management in early clinical multiple trauma care. Documentation of treatment and evaluation of critical care quality].

作者信息

Zintl B, Ruchholtz S, Nast-Kolb D, Waydhas C, Schweiberer L

机构信息

Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.

出版信息

Unfallchirurg. 1997 Oct;100(10):811-9. doi: 10.1007/s001130050198.

Abstract

Quality management in early clinical care of patients with multiple injuries (description of actual process, identification of problems, implementation of quality improvement) is not possible without sufficient baseline data about the present situation of medical treatment. This study investigates whether the current documentation of treatment in the emergency room is appropriate to judge upon the quality of the process and to detect problems. In addition, a set of baseline data is presented. The performance in the treatment of 126 multiple injured patients was prospectively recorded from 1988 to 1993 and compared with an idealized process based upon an algorithm. The quality of present data recording was analysed, and criteria for judgement of quality of care were assessed. The algorithm was divided into 117 possible steps (one step consisting of a single decision criterion, the decision and the corresponding procedure). Per patient, only 61% +/- 12% of these steps were sufficiently documented to allow judgement. Using several criteria for assessment, the following baseline data could be observed (times shown refer to admission to the trauma room): (1) trauma room time of 129 +/- 55 min; (2) completion of basic radiological and sonographic diagnostics in 91% of patients; (3) first blood collection after 17 +/- 11 min; (4) cranial computerised tomography after 55 +/- 20 min; (5) missed injuries during the trauma room period in 32% of patients; (6) intubation after 20 +/- 19 min; (7) insertion of a chest tube after 30 +/- 17 min; (8) first blood transfusion in shock after 32 +/- 17 min; (9) transfused blood within the first hour of 4.2 +/- 2.8 units and within the second hour of 8.5 +/- 4.7 units; (10) emergency operations in shock after 98 +/- 55 min; (11) early operations after 156 +/- 69 min; (12) craniotomy after 124 +/- 37 min; (13) unplanned surgery within 24 hours after admission to the intensive care unit in 11% of patients. The study presented here supplies information on timing and other process data of the acute clinical care of seriously injured patients. In particular, the data represent indicators for the quality of emergency room management, which may be used as baseline to compose improvement measures of structure and process. The quality of data collection has to be improved for carrying out an exact analysis of the process.

摘要

在缺乏关于当前医疗现状的充分基线数据的情况下,对多发伤患者进行早期临床护理的质量管理(描述实际过程、识别问题、实施质量改进)是不可能的。本研究调查急诊室当前的治疗记录是否适合用于评判治疗过程的质量并发现问题。此外,还给出了一组基线数据。前瞻性记录了1988年至1993年期间126例多发伤患者的治疗情况,并与基于算法的理想化过程进行比较。分析了当前数据记录的质量,并评估了护理质量的判断标准。该算法分为117个可能步骤(一个步骤由一个单一决策标准、决策及相应程序组成)。每位患者只有61%±12%的这些步骤有充分记录以便进行评判。使用多种评估标准,可观察到以下基线数据(所示时间指进入创伤室的时间):(1)创伤室时间为129±55分钟;(2)91%的患者完成基本放射学和超声诊断;(3)17±11分钟后首次采血;(4)55±20分钟后进行头颅计算机断层扫描;(5)32%的患者在创伤室期间存在漏诊损伤;(6)20±19分钟后进行气管插管;(7)30±17分钟后插入胸管;(8)休克后32±17分钟首次输血;(9)第一小时内输注4.2±2.8单位血液,第二小时内输注8.5±4.7单位血液;(10)休克后98±55分钟进行急诊手术;(11)156±69分钟后进行早期手术;(12)124±37分钟后进行开颅手术;(13)11%的患者在入住重症监护病房后24小时内进行非计划手术。本研究提供了重伤患者急性临床护理的时间安排和其他过程数据方面的信息。特别是,这些数据代表了急诊室管理质量的指标,可作为制定结构和过程改进措施的基线。为了对过程进行精确分析,必须提高数据收集的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验