• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[严重创伤患者治疗中的跨学科质量管理。早期临床管理中诊断和治疗过程的质量管理体系验证]

[Interdisciplinary quality management in the treatment of severely injured patients. Validation of a QM system for the diagnostic and therapeutic process in early clinical management].

作者信息

Ruchholtz S, Waydhas C, Aufmkolk M, Täger G, Piepenbrink K, Stolke D, Nast-Kolb D

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinkum Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 47145 Essen.

出版信息

Unfallchirurg. 2001 Oct;104(10):927-37. doi: 10.1007/s001130170033.

DOI:10.1007/s001130170033
PMID:11699302
Abstract

A multidisciplinary quality management system (QMS) for the early treatment of severely injured patients was validated in a trauma center in Germany. In the presented prospective study a QMS developed at another trauma center was implemented at the department of trauma surgery of the University of Essen for the presented study. The essential elements of the QMS were the establishment of (1) an adequate protocol for documentation, (2) 20 criteria for the assessment of treatment quality, (3) regular statistical analysis of treatment quality and (4) a quality circle comprising all medical specialties for data discussion. From 5/98-9/99 a cohort of 447 patients with an average injury severity score (ISS) of 22 +/- 17 was treated in the emergency department. The impact of the QMS was assessed in 4 periods (1: 5/1998-8/1998; 2: 9-12/1998; 3: 1-4/1999; 4: 5-8/1999). The quality circle met 8 times. For the improvement of the process 16 long-term changes were introduced. In 60% (n = 12) of the 20 assessment criteria significant improvements were detected. In diagnostics there were significant reductions of the time needed for basic radiological and sonographic check-up (from 24 +/- 12 min in the first to 14 +/- 8 min in the last period) and of the duration until performance of a cranial computed tomography in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI; from 45 +/- 22 to 28 +/- 8 min). The rate of delayed diagnoses remained low (4% in the first, 5% in the last period). Further positive changes were the time savings in transfusion (from 35 +/- 20 to 20 +/- 4 min) and emergency operations (from 67 +/- 20 to 48 +/- 4 min) in hemorrhagic shock as well as for craniotomies (77 +/- 41 to 54 +/- 19 min) in sTBI. Apart from the significant time reductions other improvements were found. Overall mortality was diminished from 17% in the first to 10% in the last observation period. In conclusion the study revealed that the quality of the early therapy of severely injured patients was significantly improved by implementation of a multidisciplinary quality management system especially with respect to treatment efficiency.

摘要

在德国一家创伤中心验证了一种用于严重受伤患者早期治疗的多学科质量管理体系(QMS)。在本前瞻性研究中,另一家创伤中心开发的QMS在埃森大学创伤外科实施用于本研究。QMS的基本要素包括:(1)建立适当的文件记录协议;(2)20条治疗质量评估标准;(3)定期对治疗质量进行统计分析;(4)由所有医学专科组成的质量改进小组进行数据讨论。从1998年5月至1999年9月,急诊科共治疗了447例平均损伤严重度评分(ISS)为22±17的患者。在4个时间段(1:1998年5月至8月;2:1998年9月至12月;3:1999年1月至4月;4:1999年5月至8月)评估了QMS的影响。质量改进小组共召开了8次会议。为改进流程引入了16项长期变革。在20项评估标准中的60%(n = 12)发现了显著改进。在诊断方面,基础放射学和超声检查所需时间显著减少(从第一阶段的24±12分钟降至最后阶段的14±8分钟),重度创伤性脑损伤(sTBI)患者进行头颅计算机断层扫描的时间也显著缩短(从45±22分钟降至28±8分钟)。延迟诊断率仍然较低(第一阶段为4%,最后阶段为5%)。其他积极变化包括失血性休克患者输血时间(从35±20分钟降至20±4分钟)和急诊手术时间(从67±20分钟降至48±4分钟)以及sTBI患者开颅手术时间(从77±41分钟降至54±19分钟)的节省。除了时间显著减少外,还发现了其他改进。总体死亡率从第一阶段的17%降至最后观察阶段的10%。总之,该研究表明,实施多学科质量管理体系可显著提高严重受伤患者的早期治疗质量,尤其是在治疗效率方面。

相似文献

1
[Interdisciplinary quality management in the treatment of severely injured patients. Validation of a QM system for the diagnostic and therapeutic process in early clinical management].[严重创伤患者治疗中的跨学科质量管理。早期临床管理中诊断和治疗过程的质量管理体系验证]
Unfallchirurg. 2001 Oct;104(10):927-37. doi: 10.1007/s001130170033.
2
A multidisciplinary quality management system for the early treatment of severely injured patients: implementation and results in two trauma centers.严重创伤患者早期治疗的多学科质量管理体系:两个创伤中心的实施与结果
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Oct;28(10):1395-404. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1446-8. Epub 2002 Aug 13.
3
[Quality management of early clinical treatment of severely injured patients].[严重创伤患者早期临床救治的质量管理]
Unfallchirurg. 1999 May;102(5):338-46. doi: 10.1007/s001130050415.
4
[The value of computed tomography in the early treatment of seriously injured patients].[计算机断层扫描在重伤患者早期治疗中的价值]
Chirurg. 2002 Oct;73(10):1005-12. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0429-1.
5
[Quality management in early clinical multiple trauma care. Documentation of treatment and evaluation of critical care quality].[早期临床多发性创伤护理中的质量管理。治疗记录与重症护理质量评估]
Unfallchirurg. 1997 Oct;100(10):811-9. doi: 10.1007/s001130050198.
6
[The Trauma Registry of the German Society of Trauma Surgery as a basis for interclinical quality management. A multicenter study of the German Society of Trauma Surgery].[德国创伤外科学会创伤登记作为临床间质量管理的基础。德国创伤外科学会的一项多中心研究]
Unfallchirurg. 2000 Jan;103(1):30-7. doi: 10.1007/s001130050005.
7
[Quality management in early clinical polytrauma management. II. Optimizing therapy by treatment guidelines].[早期临床多发伤管理中的质量管理。II. 通过治疗指南优化治疗]
Unfallchirurg. 1997 Nov;100(11):859-66. doi: 10.1007/s001130050205.
8
Introduction of a treatment algorithm can improve the early management of emergency patients in the resuscitation room.引入治疗算法可改善复苏室中急诊患者的早期管理。
Resuscitation. 2007 Jun;73(3):362-73. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.09.014. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
9
[Emergency trauma room management in severely and most severely injured patients. A multidisciplinary task].[严重和极重伤患者的急诊创伤室管理。一项多学科任务]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2012 Apr;107(3):217-27; quiz 228-9. doi: 10.1007/s00063-012-0093-2.
10
[The significance of delayed diagnosis of lesions in multiply traumatised patients. A study of 1,187 shock room patients].[多发伤患者损伤延迟诊断的意义。对1187例急诊室患者的研究]
Unfallchirurg. 2006 Nov;109(11):964-74; discussion 975-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1161-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Design and Development of an Objective Evaluation System for a Web-Based Simulator for Trauma Management.基于网络创伤管理模拟器的客观评估系统的设计与开发。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):714-724. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771396. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
2
Five years experience of trauma care in a German urban level I university trauma center.德国城市一级大学创伤中心五年的创伤护理经验。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Oct;35(5):448. doi: 10.1007/s00068-009-9140-y. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
3
[Expectations from the TraumaNetwork DGU®: Which goals have been achieved? What can be improved?].
[对创伤网络DGU®的期望:哪些目标已经实现?哪些方面可以改进?]
Unfallchirurg. 2016 Apr;119(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00113-014-2629-9.
4
[Trauma centre admission of severely injured or critically ill patients: comparison of estimated and real arrival times].[重伤或危重症患者的创伤中心入院:估计到达时间与实际到达时间的比较]
Unfallchirurg. 2014 Mar;117(3):242-7. doi: 10.1007/s00113-013-2529-4.
5
[Emergency room management : in the era of the White Paper, S3 guidelines, Advanced Trauma Life Support® and TraumaNetwork DGU® of the German Society of Trauma Surgery].[急诊室管理:在白皮书、S3指南、德国创伤外科学会高级创伤生命支持®和创伤网络DGU®时代]
Chirurg. 2013 May;84(5):437-50. doi: 10.1007/s00104-012-2384-9.
6
[The TraumaRegister DGU® as the basis of medical quality management. Ten years experience of a national trauma centre exemplified by emergency room treatment].[创伤注册数据库DGU®作为医疗质量管理的基础。以一家国家创伤中心十年的急诊治疗经验为例]
Unfallchirurg. 2013 Jul;116(7):624-32. doi: 10.1007/s00113-012-2251-7.
7
[Quality circle in a trauma network of the German Association for Trauma Surgery. Upgrading patient care].[德国创伤外科学会创伤网络中的质量圈。提升患者护理水平]
Unfallchirurg. 2011 Feb;114(2):172-81. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1941-2.
8
[The importance of CT angiography for screening supra-aortic vascular damage in severely injured patients].[CT血管造影术在严重创伤患者主动脉弓上血管损伤筛查中的重要性]
Unfallchirurg. 2010 May;113(5):394-400. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1751-6.
9
[Time intervals during and after emergency room treatment. An analysis using the trauma register of the German Society for Trauma Surgery].[急诊室治疗期间及之后的时间间隔。基于德国创伤外科学会创伤登记数据的分析]
Unfallchirurg. 2010 Jan;113(1):36-43. doi: 10.1007/s00113-009-1700-4.
10
Establishing the evidence base for trauma quality improvement: a collaborative WHO-IATSIC review.建立创伤质量改进的证据基础:世界卫生组织-国际创伤系统协作审查
World J Surg. 2009 May;33(5):1075-86. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-9959-8.