On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems.

OBJECTIVE

To compare film for intra-oral radiography with two charge-coupled device (CCD) and one storage phosphor system for digital imaging in respect of subjective image quality, detectability of small mass differences and appearance of burn-out effects and blooming phenomena at various exposure times.

METHODS

Dried mandibles with teeth from different areas were radiographed at exposures covering a relative range from 1 to 100. Image quality was subjectively evaluated after image processing, when applicable, using a visual grading scale from 0 to 10. The number of visible holes in an aluminium block was used to measure the detectability of small mass differences. Burn-out effects and blooming were evaluated by measuring widths of roots and of aluminium and plastic cylinders.

RESULTS

Radiographs with the storage phosphor system achieved image quality scores similar to those of film but over a larger exposure range, while CCD images were rated lower and over a smaller range. All holes in the aluminium block were only detected with the storage phosphor system. While the widths of roots were strongly affected by sensor saturation in CCD images and by burn-out in film images, smaller effects were seen with the storage phosphor system. Similar results were obtained with aluminium and plastic cylinders.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher image quality was achieved over a much wider exposure range with the storage phosphor system than with either film or the CCD systems.