Ananth C V, Kleinbaum D G
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick 08901-1977, USA.
Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Dec;26(6):1323-33. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.6.1323.
Epidemiologists are often interested in estimating the risk of several related diseases as well as adverse outcomes, which have a natural ordering of severity or certainty. While most investigators choose to model several dichotomous outcomes (such as very low birthweight versus normal and moderately low birthweight versus normal), this approach does not fully utilize the available information. Several statistical models for ordinal responses have been proposed, but have been underutilized. In this paper, we describe statistical methods for modelling ordinal response data, and illustrate the fit of these models to a large database from a perinatal health programme.
Models considered here include (1) the cumulative logit model, (2) continuation-ratio model, (3) constrained and unconstrained partial proportional odds models, (4) adjacent-category logit model, (5) polytomous logistic model, and (6) stereotype logistic model. We illustrate and compare the fit of these models on a perinatal database, to study the impact of midline episiotomy procedure on perineal lacerations during labour and delivery. Finally, we provide a discussion on graphical methods for the assessment of model assumptions and model constraints, and conclude with a discussion on the choice of an ordinal model. The primary focus in this paper is the formulation of ordinal models, interpretation of model parameters, and their implications for epidemiological research.
This paper presents a synthesized review of generalized linear regression models for analysing ordered responses. We recommend that the analyst performs (i) goodness-of-fit tests and an analysis of residuals, (ii) sensitivity analysis by fitting and comparing different models, and (iii) by graphically examining the model assumptions.
流行病学家常常对估计几种相关疾病以及不良后果的风险感兴趣,这些疾病和后果在严重程度或确定性方面具有自然的顺序。虽然大多数研究者选择对几个二分结果进行建模(如极低出生体重儿与正常体重儿、中度低出生体重儿与正常体重儿),但这种方法并未充分利用现有信息。已经提出了几种用于有序反应的统计模型,但尚未得到充分利用。在本文中,我们描述了用于对有序反应数据进行建模的统计方法,并说明了这些模型对围产期健康项目的一个大型数据库的拟合情况。
这里考虑的模型包括:(1)累积对数模型;(2)连续比例模型;(3)受限和无约束的部分比例优势模型;(4)相邻类别对数模型;(5)多分类逻辑模型;(6)刻板逻辑模型。我们在一个围产期数据库上说明并比较这些模型的拟合情况,以研究会阴正中切开术对分娩期间会阴撕裂的影响。最后,我们讨论用于评估模型假设和模型约束的图形方法,并以关于有序模型选择的讨论作为结论。本文的主要重点是有序模型的构建、模型参数的解释及其对流行病学研究的意义。
本文对用于分析有序反应的广义线性回归模型进行了综合综述。我们建议分析人员进行:(i)拟合优度检验和残差分析;(ii)通过拟合和比较不同模型进行敏感性分析;(iii)通过图形检查模型假设。