Suppr超能文献

What's in a name? A comparison of four psychiatric assessments.

作者信息

Hotopf M, Sharp D, Lewis G

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Jan;33(1):27-31. doi: 10.1007/s001270050018.

Abstract

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Clinical Interview Schedule and General Health Questionnaire have been designed to detect and measure severity of psychiatric disorders in different settings. We aimed to determine the relationship between each assessment within a mixed primary care population. The questionnaires and interviews were administered to a sample of 49 patients attending an urban general practice. The total score for each scale correlated closely with every other one (correlation coefficients = 0.70-0.79). Factor analysis suggested that all of the scales were measuring a single underlying construct with reliabilities of 0.68-0.78. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to the assessment of severity of depression and other neurotic symptoms. We suggest that the Clinical Interview Schedule is a feasible alternative to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and discuss reasons why it might be preferable within clinical trials of depression.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验