Suppr超能文献

为商业代孕辩护,反驳范·尼凯克和范·齐尔。

Defending commercial surrogate motherhood against Van Niekerk and Van Zyl.

作者信息

McLachlan H V

机构信息

Department of Social Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1997 Dec;23(6):344-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.6.344.

Abstract

The arguments of Van Niekerk and Van Zyl that, on the grounds that it involves an inappropriate commodification and alienation of women's labour, commercial surrogate motherhood (CSM) is morally suspect are discussed and considered to be defective. In addition, doubt is cast on the notion that CSM should be illegal.

摘要

范·尼凯克和范·齐尔认为,商业代孕(CSM)因涉及对女性劳动力的不当商品化和异化,在道德上存在问题,本文对这一观点进行了讨论,并认为其存在缺陷。此外,对于商业代孕应属非法的观点也提出了质疑。

相似文献

2
The ethics of surrogacy: women's reproductive labour.代孕伦理:女性的生殖劳动
J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):345-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.6.345.
7
Surrogate motherhood as prenatal adoption.
Law Med Health Care. 1988 Spring-Summer;16(1-2):44-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1988.tb01049.x.

本文引用的文献

1
The ethics of surrogacy: women's reproductive labour.代孕伦理:女性的生殖劳动
J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):345-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.6.345.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验