McLachlan H V
Department of Social Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University.
J Med Ethics. 1997 Dec;23(6):344-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.6.344.
The arguments of Van Niekerk and Van Zyl that, on the grounds that it involves an inappropriate commodification and alienation of women's labour, commercial surrogate motherhood (CSM) is morally suspect are discussed and considered to be defective. In addition, doubt is cast on the notion that CSM should be illegal.
范·尼凯克和范·齐尔认为,商业代孕(CSM)因涉及对女性劳动力的不当商品化和异化,在道德上存在问题,本文对这一观点进行了讨论,并认为其存在缺陷。此外,对于商业代孕应属非法的观点也提出了质疑。