Glitsch U, Baumann W
Institute of Biomechanics, Sport University Cologne, Germany.
J Biomech. 1997 Nov-Dec;30(11-12):1123-31. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00089-4.
A three-dimensional model of the lower limb containing 47 muscles was developed to study the differences between a two- and three-dimensional approach for determining internal loads, the role of the dynamic joint representation, and the behavior of different load-bearing criteria in walking and running. The problem of redundancy of the musculo-skeletal system was resolved by applying inverse dynamics and static optimization methods. Different hypothetical load-bearing capabilities of hinge, spherical and intermediate joint types for the knee and the ankle joints were tested. It was found that even almost planar movements such as walking and running are associated with significant three-dimensional intersegment moments, especially in the frontal plane. Thus, a two-dimensional approach may underestimate internal loads up to 60%. It is shown that pure hinge joints are inappropriate for modeling the dynamical joint function of the knee and ankle joints. A more flexible joint representation in combination with a squared muscle stress minimization criterion predicted a lot of synergistic as well as antagonistic muscle activation which was also found in the EMG patterns. The results indicate the importance of muscular joint stabilization in natural human movements. Compared to in vivo measurements it is speculated that the predicted force magnitudes are considerably overestimated due to error propagation and still insufficient anatomical models. Thus, increased efforts to improve further the reliability of internal load calculations should be made in the future.
开发了一个包含47块肌肉的下肢三维模型,以研究二维和三维方法在确定内部负荷方面的差异、动态关节表示的作用以及不同负荷承受标准在步行和跑步中的行为。通过应用逆动力学和静态优化方法解决了肌肉骨骼系统冗余的问题。测试了膝关节和踝关节的铰链、球形和中间关节类型的不同假设承重能力。结果发现,即使是步行和跑步等几乎平面的运动也与显著的三维节段间力矩相关,尤其是在额平面。因此,二维方法可能会低估高达60%的内部负荷。结果表明,纯铰链关节不适用于模拟膝关节和踝关节的动态关节功能。结合平方肌肉应力最小化标准的更灵活的关节表示预测了许多协同以及拮抗肌肉激活,这也在肌电图模式中发现。结果表明了肌肉关节稳定在自然人体运动中的重要性。与体内测量相比,推测由于误差传播和解剖模型仍然不足,预测的力大小被大大高估。因此,未来应加大努力进一步提高内部负荷计算的可靠性。