• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The Edinburgh Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (EEGOS): rationale and pilot studies.

作者信息

Hellawell D J, Signorini D F

机构信息

Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Astley Ainslie Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Int J Rehabil Res. 1997 Dec;20(4):345-54. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199712000-00001.

DOI:10.1097/00004356-199712000-00001
PMID:9459101
Abstract

The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is the most widely used outcome measure in head injury research. However, it is a global and relatively insensitive measure, precluding any description of the types of impairments that lead to the disability. The Edinburgh Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (EEGOS) was devised as a new outcome measure that retains the advantages of the existing GOS but allows comparison of patterns of recovery in different areas of function; behavioural, cognitive and physical. This report describes pilot studies of the EEGOS used retrospectively, and in 'live' face-to-face interviews. The results show raw percentage agreements of 45%, 60% and 70% in the retrospective study, and 83%, 78% and 83% in the 'live' study. These results demonstrate that the inter-rater reliability of the EEGOS is comparable to that of the GOS applied in similar situations.

摘要

相似文献

1
The Edinburgh Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (EEGOS): rationale and pilot studies.
Int J Rehabil Res. 1997 Dec;20(4):345-54. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199712000-00001.
2
Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the glasgow outcome scale.与格拉斯哥预后量表相关的头部损伤的情感和认知后果。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;69(2):204-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.69.2.204.
3
Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use.格拉斯哥预后量表和扩展格拉斯哥预后量表的结构化访谈:使用指南
J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):573-85. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573.
4
Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.分析重型颅脑损伤的治疗结果:关于推进格拉斯哥预后量表应用的综述与更新
J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):587-97. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.587.
5
Inter-rater agreement on assessment of outcome within a trauma registry.创伤登记系统中对结果评估的评分者间一致性。
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):130-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
6
Assessing disability after head injury: improved use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.评估头部损伤后的残疾情况:格拉斯哥预后量表的改进应用。
J Neurosurg. 1998 Dec;89(6):939-43. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.6.0939.
7
Predictors of outcome in civilians with gunshot wounds to the head upon presentation.头部枪伤平民就诊时的预后预测因素。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Sep;121(3):645-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.JNS131872. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
8
Prognostic factors and outcome of children with severe head injury: an 8-year experience.重度颅脑损伤儿童的预后因素及结局:八年经验总结
Childs Nerv Syst. 2002 Apr;18(3-4):129-36. doi: 10.1007/s00381-002-0558-3. Epub 2002 Feb 15.
9
The motor response to stimulation predicts outcome as well as the full Glasgow Coma Scale in children with severe head injury.刺激引发的运动反应可预测预后,与儿童严重颅脑损伤的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(Glasgow Coma Scale)一样准确。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 May;11(3):339-42. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181c014ab.
10
Reliability of postal questionnaires for the Glasgow Outcome Scale.用于格拉斯哥预后量表的邮寄问卷调查的可靠性
J Neurotrauma. 2002 Sep;19(9):999-1005. doi: 10.1089/089771502760341910.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosing the GOSE: Structural and Psychometric Properties Using Item Response Theory, a TRACK-TBI Pilot Study.诊断 GOSE:使用项目反应理论的结构和心理计量学特性,TRACK-TBI 初步研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Sep 1;36(17):2493-2505. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5998. Epub 2019 May 23.
2
Predictive utility of an adapted Marshall head CT classification scheme after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后改良马歇尔头颅CT分类方案的预测效用
Brain Inj. 2019;33(5):610-617. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1566970. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
3
Validating Multidimensional Outcome Assessment Using the TBI Common Data Elements: An Analysis of the TRACK-TBI Pilot Sample.
使用创伤性脑损伤通用数据元素验证多维结果评估:对TRACK-TBI试点样本的分析
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Jun 8;34(22):3158-72. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5139.
4
The functional outcome and quality of life of children after admission to an intensive care unit.儿童入住重症监护病房后的功能转归及生活质量。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 May;29(5):795-800. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1690-6. Epub 2003 Feb 21.
5
Scoring systems in trauma.创伤评分系统
Ir J Med Sci. 2000 Jul-Sep;169(3):168-72. doi: 10.1007/BF03167688.