• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1995年美国牛肉质量审计:与生产者相关的缺陷以及胴体质量和数量属性调查

National Beef Quality Audit-1995: survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes.

作者信息

Boleman S L, Boleman S J, Morgan W W, Hale D S, Griffin D B, Savell J W, Ames R P, Smith M T, Tatum J D, Field T G, Smith G C, Gardner B A, Morgan J B, Northcutt S L, Dolezal H G, Gill D R, Ray F K

机构信息

Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-2471, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 1998 Jan;76(1):96-103. doi: 10.2527/1998.76196x.

DOI:10.2527/1998.76196x
PMID:9464889
Abstract

The National Beef Quality Audit-1995 was conducted to evaluate the progress of the beef industry since the time of the National Beef Quality Audit-1991 in improving quality and consistency of beef. Nine plants were assigned for auditing to Colorado State University, Oklahoma State University, and Texas A&M University. Personnel from each institution visited three of their nine plants twice, once in the spring/summer and once in the fall/winter. Data were collected on 50% of each lot on the slaughter floor and 10% in the cooler during a single day's production (one or two shifts, as appropriate). Of the cattle audited on the slaughter floor, 47.7% had no brands, 3.0% had a shoulder brand, 16.8% had a side brand, 38.7% had a butt brand, and 6.2% had brands in multiple locations. Data revealed that 51.6% of the carcasses had no bruises, 30.9% had one bruise, 12.8% had two bruises, 3.7% had three bruises, .9% had four bruises, and .1% had more than four bruises. In addition, 7.2% of the bruises evaluated were located on the round, 41.1% were on the loin, 20.8% on the rib, and 30.8% on the chuck. Livers, lungs, tripe, heads, tongues, and whole carcasses were condemned at rates of 22.2, 5.0, 11.0, .9, 3.8, and .1%, respectively. Mean USDA yield grade and quality grade traits were as follows: USDA yield grade, 2.8; carcass weight, 338.4 kg; adjusted fat thickness, 1.2 cm; longissimus muscle area, 81.9 cm2; kidney, pelvic, and heart fat, 2.1%; USDA quality grade, High Select; overall maturity, A60; and marbling score, Small-minus.

摘要

1995年全国牛肉质量审计旨在评估自1991年全国牛肉质量审计以来牛肉行业在提高牛肉质量和一致性方面取得的进展。科罗拉多州立大学、俄克拉荷马州立大学和德克萨斯农工大学被分配对9家工厂进行审计。每个机构的人员对其9家工厂中的3家进行了两次访问,一次在春夏季,一次在秋冬季。在一天的生产过程中(视情况为一班或两班),在屠宰场收集了每批50%的数据,在冷藏库收集了10%的数据。在屠宰场接受审计的牛中,47.7%没有烙印,3.0%有肩部烙印,16.8%有侧面烙印,38.7%有臀部烙印,6.2%在多个部位有烙印。数据显示,51.6%的胴体没有瘀伤,30.9%有一处瘀伤,12.8%有两处瘀伤,3.7%有三处瘀伤,0.9%有四处瘀伤,0.1%有四处以上瘀伤。此外,评估的瘀伤中有7.2%位于后腿,41.1%位于腰部,20.8%位于肋骨,30.8%位于肩胛部。肝脏、肺、肚、头、舌和整只胴体的废弃率分别为22.2%、5.0%、11.0%、0.9%、3.8%和0.1%。美国农业部平均产量等级和质量等级特征如下:美国农业部产量等级为2.8;胴体重338.4千克;调整后的脂肪厚度1.2厘米;背最长肌面积81.9平方厘米;肾、骨盆和心脏脂肪2.1%;美国农业部质量等级为高精选级;整体成熟度为A60;大理石花纹评分小减。

相似文献

1
National Beef Quality Audit-1995: survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes.1995年美国牛肉质量审计:与生产者相关的缺陷以及胴体质量和数量属性调查
J Anim Sci. 1998 Jan;76(1):96-103. doi: 10.2527/1998.76196x.
2
National Beef Quality Audit-2000: survey of targeted cattle and carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers.2000年国家牛肉品质审计:对与育肥牛和育肥小母牛的质量、数量及价值相关的目标牛只和胴体特征的调查
J Anim Sci. 2002 May;80(5):1212-22. doi: 10.2527/2002.8051212x.
3
National Beef Quality Audit: survey of producer-related defects and carcass quality and quantity attributes.国家牛肉质量审计:与生产者相关的缺陷以及胴体质量和数量属性的调查。
J Anim Sci. 1993 Jun;71(6):1495-502. doi: 10.2527/1993.7161495x.
4
National Beef Quality Audit-2005: survey of targeted cattle and carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers.2005年美国牛肉质量审计:关于育肥牛和育肥小母牛质量、数量及价值相关的目标牛只和胴体特征调查
J Anim Sci. 2008 Dec;86(12):3533-43. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0782. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
5
National Beef Quality Audit-2011: Harvest-floor assessments of targeted characteristics that affect quality and value of cattle, carcasses, and byproducts.2011 年全国牛肉质量审计:影响牛、胴体和副产品质量和价值的目标特性的收获现场评估。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(13):5135-42. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5477. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
6
National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Transportation, mobility, and harvest-floor assessments of targeted characteristics that affect quality and value of cattle, carcasses, and by-products.2016年美国牛肉质量审计:对影响牛、胴体及副产品质量和价值的目标特征进行运输、移动性及屠宰场评估。
Transl Anim Sci. 2017 Apr 1;1(2):229-238. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0029. eCollection 2017 Apr.
7
Canadian beef quality audit.加拿大牛肉质量审计。
Can Vet J. 1997 Apr;38(4):217-25.
8
Canadian beef quality audit 1998-99.1998 - 1999年加拿大牛肉质量审计
Can Vet J. 2001 Feb;42(2):121-6.
9
National Beef Quality Audit-2011: In-plant survey of targeted carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, value, and marketing of fed steers and heifers.国家牛肉质量审计-2011:与育肥牛和小母牛的质量、数量、价值和销售相关的目标胴体特性的厂内调查。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(13):5143-51. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5550. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
10
National market cow and bull beef quality audit-1999: a survey of producer-related defects in market cows and bulls.1999年全国市场奶牛和肉牛质量审计:市场奶牛和肉牛与生产者相关缺陷的调查
J Anim Sci. 2001 Mar;79(3):658-65. doi: 10.2527/2001.793658x.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Premium-Quality Beef in the United States-A Comparison of Beef Palatability from Grain-Finished Young and Mature Beef Cattle with Varying Marbling Scores.在美国识别优质牛肉——不同大理石花纹评分的育肥牛和成年肉牛的牛肉适口性比较
Foods. 2025 Feb 17;14(4):676. doi: 10.3390/foods14040676.
2
National Beef Quality Audit-2022: in-plant assessments of quality and yield determining carcass characteristics of fed steers and heifers.2022年美国牛肉质量审计:对育肥牛和育肥母牛胴体特征的质量和产量进行厂内评估。
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Jun 15;8:txae098. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae098. eCollection 2024.
3
National Beef Quality Audit-2022 Phase 1: face-to-face and digital interviews.
2022年全国牛肉品质审计第一阶段:面对面访谈和数字访谈。
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Mar 12;8:txae034. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae034. eCollection 2024.
4
Market weight, slaughter age, and yield grade to determine economic carcass traits and primal cuts yield of Hanwoo beef.通过市场体重、屠宰年龄和产量等级来确定韩牛的经济胴体性状和主要切块产量。
J Anim Sci Technol. 2022 Jan;64(1):143-154. doi: 10.5187/jast.2021.e136. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Influence of beef genotypes on animal performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and sensory characteristics in grazing or feedlot-finished steers.牛肉基因型对放牧或育肥场育肥阉牛的生长性能、胴体性状、肉质和感官特性的影响。
Transl Anim Sci. 2021 Sep 21;5(4):txab214. doi: 10.1093/tas/txab214. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Sorting beef subprimals by ribeye area size at the packer level to optimize utility and product uniformity in foodservice and retail.在包装商层面按肋眼面积大小对牛肉分割切块进行分类,以优化食品服务和零售中的效用及产品均匀性。
Transl Anim Sci. 2020 Jul 2;4(3):txaa107. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa107. eCollection 2020 Jul.
7
Evaluation of the contribution of tenderness, juiciness, and flavor to the overall consumer beef eating experience.评估嫩度、多汁性和风味对消费者整体牛肉食用体验的贡献。
Transl Anim Sci. 2018 Jan 25;2(1):26-36. doi: 10.1093/tas/txx008. eCollection 2018 Feb.
8
National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Transportation, mobility, live cattle, and carcass assessments of targeted producer-related characteristics that affect value of market cows and bulls, their carcasses, and associated by-products.2016年国家牛肉质量审计:对影响市场母牛和公牛及其胴体和相关副产品价值的目标生产者相关特征进行运输、移动性、活畜和胴体评估。
Transl Anim Sci. 2017 Dec 1;1(4):570-584. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0063. eCollection 2017 Dec.
9
National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Transportation, mobility, and harvest-floor assessments of targeted characteristics that affect quality and value of cattle, carcasses, and by-products.2016年美国牛肉质量审计:对影响牛、胴体及副产品质量和价值的目标特征进行运输、移动性及屠宰场评估。
Transl Anim Sci. 2017 Apr 1;1(2):229-238. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0029. eCollection 2017 Apr.
10
United States beef quality as chronicled by the National Beef Quality Audits, Beef Consumer Satisfaction Projects, and National Beef Tenderness Surveys - A review.由国家牛肉品质审计、牛肉消费者满意度项目和国家牛肉嫩度调查所记录的美国牛肉品质——综述
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018 Jul;31(7):1036-1042. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0199. Epub 2018 May 31.